Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | BartC <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: sscanf error checking |
| Date | 2016-12-14 17:51 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <o2s0o1$fb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <o2rp71$3e7$1@dont-email.me> <o2rqur$5t5$1@news.xmission.com> |
On 14/12/2016 16:11, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article <o2rp71$3e7$1@dont-email.me>, BartC <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
> ...
>> Output:
>>
>> Status = 1
>> X = 123.000000
>>
>> The same when scanning "123GARBAGE". It's just stopping when it sees
>> something that can't be part of the number without reporting anything
>> amiss. Which is not far off why I do.
>>
>> Am I doing something wrong or is sscanf not as great at verifying input
>> as is made out?
> You're supposed to use %n to verify that it scanned everything it was
> supposed to scan.
>
> I changed your program to:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <string.h>
>
> int main(void)
> {
> double x;
> int status,n;
> char* str = "123..456";
>
> status = sscanf(str,"%lf%n",&x,&n);
>
> printf("Status = %d, n = %d, length = %lu\n",status,n,strlen(str));
> printf("X = %f\n",x);
> }
>
> And you can see that the value of 'n' and the length of the string are not equal.
> That indicates that something went wrong.
>
OK, thanks. I'll be using sscanf on a string that already contains a
trimmed, single item that either ought to contain only a number, or that
I'm checking contains only a number.
(Actually, up to now I've only used sscanf in one place and that /was/
with a "%lf%n" format, but that was to be able to step to the next item
within a larger string.)
--
Bartc
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
sscanf error checking BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-12-14 15:42 +0000
Re: sscanf error checking John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2016-12-14 15:58 +0000
Re: sscanf error checking Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2016-12-14 11:14 -0500
Re: sscanf error checking gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-14 16:11 +0000
Re: sscanf error checking BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-12-14 17:51 +0000
Re: sscanf error checking gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-12-14 18:09 +0000
Re: sscanf error checking Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-14 19:49 +0000
Re: sscanf error checking BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-12-14 20:43 +0000
Re: sscanf error checking Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-12-14 16:40 +0000
Re: sscanf error checking Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-12-14 09:34 -0800
Re: sscanf error checking Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-12-14 14:52 -0600
Re: sscanf error checking supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-12-15 07:24 -0800
Re: sscanf error checking Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-12-15 11:26 -0800
Re: sscanf error checking Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-12-15 15:35 -0800
Re: sscanf error checking Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-12-15 16:28 -0800
Re: sscanf error checking Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2016-12-15 16:37 -0800
Re: sscanf error checking supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-12-15 16:38 -0800
Re: sscanf error checking raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2016-12-15 20:20 +0000
Re: sscanf error checking Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-12-15 12:33 -0800
sscanf error checking asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2016-12-16 01:49 -0800
sscanf error checking asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2016-12-16 01:53 -0800
csiph-web