Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #25547
| From | Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: what is the best SBC? |
| Date | 2016-12-06 10:27 +0200 |
| Organization | TGI |
| Message-ID | <o25so9$alm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <651cc4fa-4a9d-4b93-87d5-98dafb6823ce@googlegroups.com> <o23itq$vp3$1@dont-email.me> <53g1A.96517$TH2.3745@fx05.iad> <o258js$dhg$1@dont-email.me> <d5e92576-60cd-470d-9a4c-200c96db7482@googlegroups.com> |
On 06.12.2016 г. 09:30, Jack wrote: > Il giorno martedì 6 dicembre 2016 03:44:32 UTC+1, dp ha scritto: > >>> Well, as to that, you *could* program one of today's computers, re-flash >>> the BIOS and do whatever you want. You could do something similar with >>> what's usually referred to as an SBC, but many of them are come >>> pre-programmed with some operating system and what programming you do is >>> on a higher level. >>> >> >> Would you have all the datasheets needed to be able to do that? >> >> Dimiter > > Intel processors datasheet are freely available: > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/core/core-i7-900-ee-and-desktop-processor-series-datasheet-vol-1.html > > happy reading ;) > > Bye Jack > I know their processors' documentation is public. How is it with the peripheral chips, e.g. display controllers - theirs and from other vendors. How is it with the wifi chips you find on this "SBC", are they documented. Dimiter
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
what is the best SBC? andre <ahr@blabla.be> - 2016-11-30 10:26 +0100
Re: what is the best SBC? Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 01:29 -0800
Re: what is the best SBC? "tim..." <tims_new_home@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-30 12:35 +0000
Re: what is the best SBC? Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 05:22 -0800
Re: what is the best SBC? Ozzie <oz@au.com> - 2016-12-01 19:00 +0800
Re: what is the best SBC? Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 04:26 -0800
Re: what is the best SBC? "Boudewijn Dijkstra" <sp4mtr4p.boudewijn@indes.com> - 2016-12-05 11:24 +0100
Re: what is the best SBC? Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 02:46 -0800
Re: what is the best SBC? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-12-05 13:28 +0200
Re: what is the best SBC? Phil Martel <pomartel@comcast.net> - 2016-12-05 10:52 -0500
Re: what is the best SBC? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-12-06 04:44 +0200
Re: what is the best SBC? Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 23:30 -0800
Re: what is the best SBC? Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-12-06 10:27 +0200
Re: what is the best SBC? Jack <jack4747@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 01:53 -0800
Re: what is the best SBC? Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2016-12-07 19:38 +0000
Re: what is the best SBC? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-12-07 13:21 -0700
Re: what is the best SBC? upsidedown@downunder.com - 2016-12-05 21:12 +0200
Re: what is the best SBC? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-05 11:57 -0800
Re: what is the best SBC? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-11-30 02:38 -0700
Re: what is the best SBC? andre <ahr@blabla.be> - 2016-11-30 10:53 +0100
Re: what is the best SBC? Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> - 2016-11-30 18:13 +0100
Re: what is the best SBC? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-11-30 12:31 -0500
Re: what is the best SBC? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-11-30 13:23 -0700
Re: what is the best SBC? Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.com> - 2016-11-30 12:14 -0600
Re: what is the best SBC? Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> - 2016-12-02 20:04 +0000
Re: what is the best SBC? Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-12-02 13:38 -0700
Re: what is the best SBC? asdf <asdf@nospam.com> - 2016-12-01 15:16 +0000
csiph-web