Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #607476
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Purity and Density = Stars |
| Date | 2016-12-01 16:15 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <o1qedb$a01$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <9ffd9a95-94e9-46ae-b5b5-5d1b0ef57cf5@googlegroups.com> |
"reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> wrote: Its a given density was greater 11 billion years ago.It also had more critical mass.With density you get a great gravity compression force,and thus its fusion time. Sad part is stars like our Sun reached its peak 2.6 billion years ago. We are going into white dwarfs.We are finding them in our Milky way as I type. TreBert > hanson wrote: So, Bert, it's not the "dwarfs" but your "barfs" that is "a given" "as you type". Pity... unless you explain which of your 17 theories explain it better.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Purity and Density = Stars "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:59 -0800
Re: Purity and Density = Stars Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-12-01 13:13 -0800
Re: Purity and Density = Stars moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-12-04 05:32 +0000
Re: Purity and Density = Stars "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-10 13:13 -0800
Re: Purity and Density = Stars "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-10 16:58 -0800
Re: Purity and Density = Stars "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 16:15 -0800
csiph-web