Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #607464
| From | Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? |
| Date | 2016-12-01 17:00 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <o1qa2m$3bt$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <LSK%z.49713$X11.21707@fx19.am4> <eh96hd-r01.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <nq10A.150505$a14.143297@fx45.am4> |
On 12/1/2016 4:24 PM, JiiPee wrote: > On 01/12/2016 19:16, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> As for shooting cars at steel plates, does tearing the plate to pieces >> count as penetration? > > > ok put it this way: if the car goes totally (or lets say 10 meters) to > the other side of the plate we can say it penetrated it, yes. > if the plate is 1/32 inch thick, car will blow a hole in it. if plate is 1 inch thick, car will be compressed upon plate, no penetration if car melted and recast as steel spear and shot at 1 inch steel plate at 300mph, it may make it through. if replace steel plate with 1" titanium, good luck, as titanium has material charistics that make it stronger than steel in some applications
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 01:17 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 07:00 +0100
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 11:17 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 13:42 +0100
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 09:33 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 10:30 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-01 12:39 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 22:22 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 16:28 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-12-02 07:07 +0100
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 19:16 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-01 22:24 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-01 17:00 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-12-01 23:06 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? JiiPee <no@notvalid.com> - 2016-12-02 00:13 +0000
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:19 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 15:51 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 17:12 -0800
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-12-01 19:03 -0600
Re: Which one penetrates more easily...? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 20:44 -0500
csiph-web