Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language |
| Date | 2016-11-18 01:05 +0800 |
| Organization | Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong |
| Message-ID | <o0knvu$u7l$6@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <ec02f6d7-55e4-421f-9873-9e1128b534a9@googlegroups.com> <o0a2o7$j0o$3@dont-email.me> <e93fdmFn7n5U1@mid.individual.net> <o0kdqf$pv3$2@dont-email.me> <o0klua$oqi$1@dont-email.me> |
On 18/11/2016 12:30 AM, BartC wrote:
> On 17/11/2016 14:11, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>> On 17/11/2016 12:22 AM, Osmium wrote:
>>
>> From my programming experiences in the business world using Foxpro,
>> there is really no need for GOTO, *except* in ERROR HANDLING! The
>> original C language does NOT have exception handling.
>
> If someone wants to generate unstructured, intermediate code like the
> following, which other high level language /with optimising compilers/
> could be used if C didn't have 'goto'?
>
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> void testlist(node (*nos)[1],i32 n,i32 target) {
> i32 i;
> ....
Master, I think you replied the wrong thread. Maybe you people should
start learning to use new thread when an old one runs too long too many
in a limited screen.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Minimum amount of syntax for C language "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 18:56 +0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-13 11:26 +0000
[OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 19:41 +0800
Re: [OT] BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-13 12:42 +0000
Minimum amount of syntax for C language "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 20:45 +0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-11-13 07:42 -0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 00:01 +0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-11-13 10:00 -0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-11-13 13:16 -0600
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-13 19:28 +0000
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:10 -0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:34 -0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2016-11-16 10:22 -0600
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 08:33 -0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 22:11 +0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-17 16:30 +0000
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 01:05 +0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:03 -0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-17 13:58 -0500
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-17 19:10 +0000
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-17 17:41 -0500
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 11:03 -0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-11-17 11:56 -0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 12:17 -0800
Re: Minimum amount of syntax for C language Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 12:21 -0800
csiph-web