Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #398622

Re: This is your guru

From Kieth Staudt <KiethS@StaudtInstitute.info>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: This is your guru
Date 2016-11-16 18:12 +0000
Organization Kieth Staudt Institute of Applied Modern Physics
Message-ID <o0i7ia$1glj$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <e1398e7a-da47-4ca1-b07a-b2927fd989a9@googlegroups.com> <20161116105207.31ebbe9f@maxa-pc> <MLCdnVCpc9VZFbHFnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Tom Roberts wrote:

>> Well strictly speaking, formula is not complete without explanation.
> 
> YES! All too many people around here forget this important point,
> presenting meaningless formulas without explanations. Your recognition
> of this is why I provided the above explanation.
> JanPB knows all this, but you other guys apparently do not. Of course
> none of you have actually answered his challenge question. (I can do so,
> and he knows I can, but why should I spoil the circus....) Tom Roberts

Hmm yes, as solving Einstein's non-linear differential equations of 
gravity is very difficult. Not even Einstein himself thought that this 
would ever be possible. However, Karl Schwarzschild was able to solve the 
equations for a spherical symmetric static body. Static means that the 
mass is kept unchanged (or independent over time.) Today, the Schwarzschild 
solution is used for most simple scenarios. Einstein himself did not use 
the methods of Schwarzschild but instead used direct approximation 
techniques. Still he was able to conclude that planet Mercury had a 
precession of 43 arc seconds (43/3600 degrees) per century, which was in 
stunning agreement with observation. :)

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 00:09 -0800
  Re: This is your guru Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-16 10:52 +0100
    Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 02:41 -0800
      Re: This is your guru Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-16 11:43 +0100
        Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 03:49 -0800
          Re: This is your guru Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-16 13:18 +0100
            Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 04:48 -0800
              Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 21:54 -0800
                Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:19 -0800
                Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 23:32 -0800
                Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:38 -0800
                Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 00:14 -0800
                Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 00:38 -0800
                Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:37 -0800
                Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 22:36 -0800
    Re: This is your guru Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-16 10:26 -0600
      Re: This is your guru Kieth Staudt <KiethS@StaudtInstitute.info> - 2016-11-16 18:12 +0000
      Re: This is your guru Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-11-16 19:28 +0100
      Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 21:57 -0800
        Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:34 -0800
          Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 00:23 -0800
            Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 03:37 -0800
              Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:39 -0800
                Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 22:50 -0800
                Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 23:52 -0800
                Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-18 00:53 -0800
                Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 12:28 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-11-19 10:07 +0100
                Re: This is your guru Marion Vanriper <Marion@Vanriper.info> - 2016-11-26 09:30 +0000
        Re: This is your guru Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-17 10:09 -0600
  Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 12:11 -0800
    Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:14 -0800
      Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 23:35 -0800
        Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-16 23:52 -0800
          Re: This is your guru JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 00:25 -0800
            Re: This is your guru paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 03:59 -0800
              Re: This is your guru "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> - 2016-11-17 12:12 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-18 05:07 +0100
                Re: This is your guru "Dan S. MacAbre" <no@way.com> - 2016-11-18 10:02 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-18 22:13 +0100
                Re: This is your guru "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-18 21:46 -0800
                Re: This is your guru "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-11-19 09:30 +0100
                Re: This is your guru Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-19 10:01 -0600
                Re: This is your guru "David (Time Lord) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-19 08:07 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Norberto Haman <norberman@norberman.info> - 2016-11-19 16:37 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-20 09:37 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Norberto Haman <norberman@norberman.info> - 2016-11-20 20:32 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-20 15:54 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> - 2016-11-21 15:00 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-21 19:16 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> - 2016-11-22 10:39 +0000
                Re: This is your guru paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 03:16 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Maryann Tonn <libradaz@libradazert.info> - 2016-11-22 11:24 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Ned Latham <nedlatham@woden.valhalla.oz> - 2016-11-22 12:13 +0000
                Re: This is your guru benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:37 -0500
                Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-22 22:57 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 13:37 +0000
                Re: This is your guru paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 06:04 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 14:27 +0000
                Re: This is your guru paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 06:44 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 14:56 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Steven Carlip <carlip@physics.ucdavis.edu> - 2016-11-23 10:46 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-23 23:21 +0100
                Re: This is your guru Bob Goodman <bobg@boobgodman.info> - 2016-11-23 22:58 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-25 20:00 +0100
                Re: This is your guru Bernardo Dearmond <bnard@dearmond.org> - 2016-11-25 21:46 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-25 22:56 +0100
                Re: This is your guru "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-23 20:13 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:24 -0600
                Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 15:33 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-23 23:23 +0100
                Re: This is your guru "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-23 20:15 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-25 20:05 +0100
                Re: This is your guru "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-25 14:57 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 18:28 +0000
                Re: This is your guru Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 19:37 +0100
                Re: This is your guru Dusty Kollman <uberdriver@uberdriver.info> - 2016-11-23 18:39 +0000
                Re: This is your guru "David (Lord Kronos) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-21 22:40 -0800
                Re: This is your guru Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-11-19 10:47 -0600
                Re: This is your guru Norberto Haman <norberman@norberman.info> - 2016-11-19 17:20 +0000
              Re: This is your guru mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-11-17 04:37 -0800

csiph-web