Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | BartC <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Simplest compiler for C |
| Date | 2016-11-14 19:42 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <o0d42c$53u$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <o0c598$feb$5@dont-email.me> <4232d4c1-5461-40b8-8eac-94d0e9e055b6@googlegroups.com> <o0cs8t$58a$2@dont-email.me> <o0cvdo$ij4$1@dont-email.me> <o0d24h$tbb$1@dont-email.me> |
On 14/11/2016 19:09, jacobnavia wrote: > > So, you are running a simulation of linux under windows. In that > emulation you run the windows emulator, that eventually runs your program. > > No wonder! AFAIK native code code ought to run at full speed, as it is not emulating the x86 processor. And some programs do. But others (like some of mine!) run slower than they ought, even leaving wine out of it, but perhaps 30-50% slower. And one seemed to be sensitive to some cache issues. So something about it (Virtualbox) is causing problems. At the moment however I can only generate executable code to run natively on Linux via gcc, which is yet another factor. (And I didn't forget the -O3!) -- Bartc
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 18:57 +0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-14 08:44 -0600
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 22:46 +0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:15 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 01:29 +0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C Dutch Ingraham <spikeheron@att.net> - 2016-11-14 11:43 -0600
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 19:18 +0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-14 18:23 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-11-14 20:09 +0100
Re: Simplest compiler for C Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 19:11 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-14 19:42 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:00 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:17 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:19 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-14 12:40 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 13:08 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 13:12 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:10 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-15 10:05 +0100
Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-15 09:50 +0100
Re: Simplest compiler for C luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:39 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-14 09:53 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:31 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-14 18:57 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:07 -0800
Re: optimization "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 19:20 +0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-15 12:56 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 05:34 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-15 16:07 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 08:59 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-15 21:35 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 15:33 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-16 14:58 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 08:44 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:54 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 09:11 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 09:36 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-16 11:41 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:45 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 18:54 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 04:44 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 08:42 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:17 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:42 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 09:57 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 10:07 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 11:35 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 12:02 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 13:23 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 13:55 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-11-17 15:15 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 10:41 +0100
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-18 12:12 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-18 13:24 +0100
Re: Simplest compiler for C Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-11-18 09:45 -0500
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-17 20:08 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 12:21 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 03:22 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 19:23 +0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 03:36 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 19:52 +0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 17:55 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-16 17:19 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-16 19:09 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-16 23:12 +0100
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-16 14:21 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-11-16 18:02 -0500
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-17 17:01 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-18 01:05 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C jameskuyper@verizon.net - 2016-11-18 10:38 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-20 15:38 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-17 09:57 +0100
Re: Simplest compiler for C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-11-17 11:25 +0000
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:56 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 09:10 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 09:34 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:32 -0800
[OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 22:50 +0800
Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 07:46 -0800
Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 00:12 +0800
Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:02 -0800
Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 01:14 +0800
Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:24 -0800
Re: [OT] Output of C compilers and CPU architectures "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 01:27 +0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 21:49 +0300
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:02 -0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 21:37 +0300
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 18:07 +0800
Re: Simplest compiler for C "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 20:15 +0800
csiph-web