Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #603890

Re: Simple Probability Question

From Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Simple Probability Question
Date 2016-11-06 15:06 +0100
Organization Good company
Message-ID <nvndcc$coi$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <nvnbfc$6ai$1@dont-email.me> <nvncev$9hh$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Dne 06/11/2016 v 14:50 Poutnik napsal(a):

> The 50/50 head/tail applies for events independent on each other.
> 
> But your scenario is almost the opposite.
> From previous head/tailyou can predict next head/tail.
> There would be near 100% heads or tails.
> 
> I say near, because there will be
> some residual random influences you have not eliminated.
> 
P.S.> Real result will be somewhere on scale
from 50/50 for fully random events

   ( this is true as limit case for infinite number for trials,
   otherwise it would follow binomical statistical distribution
   with 50/50 as centre.)

till 100/0 for fully deterministic events.

-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Simple Probability Question Bob <rgsros@notme.invalid> - 2016-11-06 08:34 -0500
  Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 14:50 +0100
    Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 15:06 +0100
    Re: Simple Probability Question Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-11-06 10:37 -0500
      Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:47 +0100
  Re: Simple Probability Question Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-11-06 17:44 +0100
  Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-06 12:50 -0600
    Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 20:04 +0100
      Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-06 14:51 -0600
        Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 22:24 +0100
  Re: Simple Probability Question Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-06 13:24 -0800
    Re: Simple Probability Question "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:08 -0800
  Re: Simple Probability Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:08 -0600
    Re: Simple Probability Question jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-07 18:42 +0000
    Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-07 15:44 -0600
      Re: Simple Probability Question jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-07 21:54 +0000
        Re: Simple Probability Question benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 18:20 -0500
          Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-08 12:13 -0600

csiph-web