Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #603890
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Simple Probability Question |
| Date | 2016-11-06 15:06 +0100 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <nvndcc$coi$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <nvnbfc$6ai$1@dont-email.me> <nvncev$9hh$1@dont-email.me> |
Dne 06/11/2016 v 14:50 Poutnik napsal(a): > The 50/50 head/tail applies for events independent on each other. > > But your scenario is almost the opposite. > From previous head/tailyou can predict next head/tail. > There would be near 100% heads or tails. > > I say near, because there will be > some residual random influences you have not eliminated. > P.S.> Real result will be somewhere on scale from 50/50 for fully random events ( this is true as limit case for infinite number for trials, otherwise it would follow binomical statistical distribution with 50/50 as centre.) till 100/0 for fully deterministic events. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Simple Probability Question Bob <rgsros@notme.invalid> - 2016-11-06 08:34 -0500
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 14:50 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 15:06 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-11-06 10:37 -0500
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:47 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-11-06 17:44 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-06 12:50 -0600
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 20:04 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-06 14:51 -0600
Re: Simple Probability Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 22:24 +0100
Re: Simple Probability Question Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-06 13:24 -0800
Re: Simple Probability Question "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:08 -0800
Re: Simple Probability Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:08 -0600
Re: Simple Probability Question jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-07 18:42 +0000
Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-07 15:44 -0600
Re: Simple Probability Question jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-07 21:54 +0000
Re: Simple Probability Question benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 18:20 -0500
Re: Simple Probability Question Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-08 12:13 -0600
csiph-web