Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433820
| From | Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer |
| Date | 2016-11-04 10:54 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nvhlse$354$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <nvfc2s$6r6$1@dont-email.me> <nvfd3r$aj5$1@dont-email.me> <4aum1c1gog519isp42g1hhcac03beg96ki@4ax.com> <nvhhj5$bjr$1@dont-email.me> |
On 3.11.16 19:55, John Larkin wrote: > > Leakage inductance can matter. > > It would be interesting to make a toroidal transformer where the > 1-turn winding wraps around the entire core. Visualize that! It can be > approximated by paralleling multiple 1t windings. I build 'wall current monitors' to measure the beam current in particle accelerators. Those are basically single-turn transformers very much like that: The secondary winding is a toroidal shell completely enveloping the core, with a small gap across which I pick-up the output signal. Accessorily, the secondary winding is also the vacuum chamber. I also make hybrid transformers that basically create the sum and difference of two input signals on two separate outputs. One of the issues limiting performance at HF is the capacitance between the two input windings and the difference winding. I tried putting the difference winding on its own separate core, and then coupling the two cores with a single-turn winding threading both. This was in practice a piece of air core coax shorted at both ends, with the two cores inside. It worked, but it wasn't enough of an improvement to be worth the bother. Jeroen Belleman
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-03 07:55 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-11-03 15:12 +0200
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-11-03 10:55 -0700
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-03 16:56 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-03 20:36 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Syd Rumpo <usenet@nononono.co.uk> - 2016-11-08 23:35 +0000
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2016-11-08 15:51 -0800
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-08 21:45 -0600
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-11-10 03:28 +0000
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-11-04 10:41 +0200
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-11-04 10:54 +0100
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer bill.sloman@ieee.org - 2016-11-04 06:00 -0700
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-11-04 14:10 +0100
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-11-04 08:08 -0700
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2016-11-04 22:13 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-11-03 14:58 +0100
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-03 09:57 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-03 09:59 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-11-03 11:56 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-03 12:15 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-11-03 19:37 +0200
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer makolber@yahoo.com - 2016-11-03 10:49 -0700
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-03 13:19 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-03 13:31 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-11-03 14:38 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-11-03 14:39 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-03 16:52 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 18:00 -0700
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-04 06:26 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-11-04 15:20 +0200
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-04 09:33 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-11-04 21:21 +0200
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer "tom" <tmiller11147@verizon.net> - 2016-11-03 14:02 -0400
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-11-03 10:25 -0700
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-11-04 11:24 -0700
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-11-04 21:24 +0200
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-04 16:46 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-11-05 12:37 -0500
Re: 50 ohms to 0.02 ohm transformer mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-11-05 02:29 -0700
csiph-web