Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux.mageia > #14240
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux.mageia, alt.os.linux.pclinuxos, comp.os.linux.hardware, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. |
| Date | 2016-11-03 17:19 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nvfrjv$tj$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <nvef3u$e04$1@dont-email.me> <nvf2h2$3vo$1@dont-email.me> <nvfiu3$u2v$1@dont-email.me> <nvfkoa$455$1@dont-email.me> <nvflgf$aet$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 2016-11-03, Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> wrote: > On 11/03/2016 08:22 AM, William Unruh wrote: >> On 2016-11-03, Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> wrote: >>> On 11/03/2016 03:11 AM, William Unruh wrote: >>>> On 2016-11-03, Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/02/2016 08:39 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-11-02, Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi guys and gals, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sad news but remediable. Should be spread around... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/blue-leds-light-up-your-brain/?WT.mc_id=SA_HLTH_20161101> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DEA is going to be after this deleterious stimulant. ;^) >>>>>> >>>>>> Hah! They can have it. Now I have scientific justification for my >>>>>> hatred of the blue-LED craze. (Aside from my eyes' inability to >>>>>> focus on those wavelengths.) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Try adjusting the gamma in System Setting/Hardware/Monitor toward red >>>>> and away from blue and green. >>>> >>>> There exist programs to do this automatically at night (using the >>>> system clock) Right now I cannot remember the name of any of them. >>>> >>>> I had it running on my system for a while and then forgot about it. >>>> Probably on there somewhere still. >>>> >>> >>> f.lux is referred to in the URL I posted but it is not compliled >>> for my OS so I simply went to the simplest (for me) correction. >> >> >> xflux for Linux >> >> Not sure what you mean by "not compiled for my OS? > > It is not in the repositories I use but I will search on xflux when I > have the time. https://justgetflux.com/linux.html It is apparently a pre-compiled (ie not open source) program. It uses randr to adjust the screen colour temperature at appropriate times of the day, as defined by your location on earth. >> >> >>> Back in my early Amiga OS days I regularly messed with color settings >>> to off the overscan/interlace settings I used. > > bliss >
Back to alt.os.linux.mageia | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-01 18:52 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2016-11-02 20:44 +1100
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-02 06:23 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 10:16 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 00:19 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 23:46 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-03 07:07 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:49 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-04 05:42 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-11-04 09:41 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-04 10:00 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 20:12 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2016-11-03 08:47 -0400
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 20:14 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:50 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 00:18 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-11-03 03:44 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 18:42 -0500
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-07 08:01 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2016-11-02 08:38 -0400
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-02 06:28 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 18:46 -0500
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 00:21 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-11-03 03:39 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-02 21:40 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-11-03 10:11 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-11-03 06:54 -0400
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-03 07:52 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-11-03 15:22 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-03 08:36 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-11-03 17:19 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2016-11-03 13:11 -0400
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-11-03 19:24 +0000
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-03 08:07 -0700
Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Ikke <hviaene@invalid.org> - 2016-11-04 09:44 +0100
csiph-web