Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.os.linux.mageia > #14234

Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens.

From Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com>
Newsgroups alt.os.linux.mageia
Subject Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens.
Date 2016-11-03 08:07 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nvfjqb$4g9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <nvbgrd$poc$1@dont-email.me> <Oumdnb9JFcq6a4fFnZ2dnUU7-UHNnZ2d@edpnet.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/03/2016 01:32 AM, Ikke wrote:
> Bobbie Sellers wrote:
>
>> Hi guys and gals,
>>
>>      Sad news but remediable.  Should be spread around...
>>
>> <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/blue-leds-light-up-your-brain/?WT.mc_id=SA_HLTH_20161101>
>>
>> DEA is going to be after this deleterious stimulant. ;^)
>>
>>          bliss
>>
>
> That isn't news at all. Stories like that (I don't call these reports) are
> circulating already a long time. Somewhat the opposite also circulates: some
> people with sleeping disorders are advised a light therapy: sit in front of
> a very strong (rather blueish white light) for about 30 min, then dim the
> light. The simulation of sunset is supposed to get to sleep easier.
> All this is mostly particular cases, I suspect most of it is just a
> "placebo" effect.
> BTW, I consider this the biggest unsolved problem in medicine: why do
> placebo's work????
>
> Herman Viaene


	Herman did you read the article?
	Not a newspaper story but a report on research.
  	
	Oh well you are probable a young fellow and think that you are supposed 
to be awake half the night punching your keyboard.

	Placebos work for various reasons and one is that most conditions are 
self-correcting especially when young.  Some conditions
do not self-correct and that is when you need medication of some
kind.  Other sorts of conditions self-correct with age and experience
if you have some regard for your body, eat, rest and sleep in 
appropriate amounts, you generally get over them.

	bliss

-- 
bliss dash SF 4 ever at dslextreme dot com

Back to alt.os.linux.mageia | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-01 18:52 -0700
  Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2016-11-02 20:44 +1100
    Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-02 06:23 -0700
    Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 10:16 -0700
      Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 00:19 +0000
        Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 23:46 -0700
          Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-03 07:07 +0000
            Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:49 -0700
              Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-04 05:42 +0000
              Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-11-04 09:41 +0000
                Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-04 10:00 +0000
          Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 20:12 +0000
        Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2016-11-03 08:47 -0400
          Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 20:14 +0000
          Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:50 -0700
    Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 00:18 +0000
      Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-11-03 03:44 +0000
        Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 18:42 -0500
          Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-07 08:01 +0000
  Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2016-11-02 08:38 -0400
    Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-02 06:28 -0700
      Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 18:46 -0500
    Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2016-11-03 00:21 +0000
  Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-11-03 03:39 +0000
    Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-02 21:40 -0700
      Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-11-03 10:11 +0000
        Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-11-03 06:54 -0400
        Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-03 07:52 -0700
          Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-11-03 15:22 +0000
            Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-03 08:36 -0700
              Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-11-03 17:19 +0000
        Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2016-11-03 13:11 -0400
      Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-11-03 19:24 +0000
  Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Bobbie Sellers <bliss@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-11-03 08:07 -0700
    Re: Bad news for screen watchers especially if you prefer bright screens. Ikke <hviaene@invalid.org> - 2016-11-04 09:44 +0100

csiph-web