Groups > sci.electronics.design > #433097

Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true?

From	rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true?
Date	2016-10-30 22:09 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nv693o$fvm$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<3ed9d0b4-3317-403a-8b3a-7a1bdce16bf0@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/29/2016 4:46 PM, stacy4linnix@gmail.com wrote:
> http://pro.oxfordclub.com/A4DTAX0416TO79OXFLTBRKCAMALE4IUPS4/POXFSA03/?h=true
>
> Can i buy an EV (i.e. GM Bolt) and get 30K back?

I'm not sure about the second part of that question, but I think the 
answer to the first part is "no".  I've been patrolling the Chevy 
dealers around here and they can't even talk to me about the Bolt yet. 
Looking online I see no indication a typical consumer will be able to 
buy a Bolt any time this year.

:(

-- 

Rick C

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Obama Rebate:  too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:46 -0700
  Re: Obama Rebate:  too good to be true? stacy4linnix@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 13:56 -0700
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 10:30 -0500
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 12:20 -0400
        Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:11 -0500
          Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:06 -0400
            Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:35 -0500
          Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 18:50 -0400
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-31 12:28 -0400
  Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-29 21:55 -0400
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-30 11:43 -0700
    Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 12:19 -0500
      Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? bitrex <bitrex@de.lete.earthlink.net> - 2016-10-31 14:12 -0400
        Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-31 13:39 -0500
  Re: Obama Rebate: too good to be true? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 22:09 -0400

csiph-web