Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #25280

Re: Checking large numbers of files

From Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: Checking large numbers of files
Date 2016-10-29 16:19 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nv3apv$cei$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <f2135f2c-b23d-467c-840e-8e2dd5024287@googlegroups.com> <nv033a$db2$1@dont-email.me> <1f8b68f4-82ce-46af-870e-994993336526@googlegroups.com> <nv300c$a8h$1@dont-email.me> <581526f0$0$29508$c3e8da3$c8b7d2e6@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/29/2016 3:47 PM, Clifford Heath wrote:
> On 30/10/16 07:15, Don Y wrote:
>> On 10/29/2016 5:17 AM, kalvin.news@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Disclaimer: I am not an expert on the data storage, but here are my
>>> thoughts:
>>> - Use a RAID system which has enough redundancy to detect and correct
>> I started out using RAID5 "hardware" arrays (and other, more sophisticated
>> configurations).  This requires you to have multiple spindles running
>> concurrently (else the array can't *detect* discrepancies).  Compact
>> arrays also tend to suffer from cooling problems.
>>
>> It also ties you to an often proprietary (or, at least, poorly documented)
>> implementation ("volume format").  So, a failure of the hardware can leave
>> you with possibly intact volume(s) and no straightforward means of
>> accessing their contents.
>
> No. Almost all commercial RAID systems (Synology, Qnap, etc)
> use Linux RAID support. If the hardware fails, you can mount
> the drives on any Linux system that has enough SATA ports.

Really?  So my Sun RAID systems run Linux??

>> Moving volumes between arrays is seldom supported (unless you have
>> identical arrays -- hardware/software
>
> No, not true, and for the same reason. E.g. if you have a
> Synology DS1815+ with two four-drive RAID5 volumes in it, you
> can pull the four drives of a volume (without even powering off)
> and plug them into a 4-bay Qnap system. You need to configure
> the volume so it gets mounted, but because it's just a Linux
> RAID volume, it just works.

Yeah, and when I take that drive out of my Sun RAID array and
put it in that Synology box it's going to work just fine!

> <snip lots more un-educated speculation>

Seems like *you're* the one speaking from limited experience!

But, then again, you've probably never owned any "big iron".
When was the last time you had more than 4 (or 12) spindles
running on the same box?  24?  48?

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-27 15:23 -0700
  Re: Checking large numbers of files Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-10-28 09:48 +1100
    Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-27 16:48 -0700
      Re: Checking large numbers of files Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-10-28 03:17 +0300
        Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-27 18:50 -0700
          Re: Checking large numbers of files Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-10-28 05:38 +0300
            Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-27 21:33 -0700
      Re: Checking large numbers of files Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-10-28 11:40 +1100
        Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-27 18:52 -0700
  Re: Checking large numbers of files kalvin.news@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 03:50 -0700
    Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-28 10:49 -0700
      Re: Checking large numbers of files kalvin.news@gmail.com - 2016-10-29 05:17 -0700
        Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-29 13:15 -0700
          Re: Checking large numbers of files Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-10-30 09:47 +1100
            Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-29 16:19 -0700
              Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-29 16:36 -0700
              Re: Checking large numbers of files Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-10-30 12:00 +1100
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-10-30 04:05 +0200
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-10-30 14:06 +1100
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-10-30 05:48 +0200
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-29 22:33 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-10-30 17:00 +1100
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-31 04:43 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-31 14:20 +0100
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-31 08:02 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-01 09:47 +0100
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-11-01 04:36 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-01 14:29 +0100
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-11-01 15:16 +0100
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-11-02 11:42 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-29 22:15 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-29 21:50 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-10-30 17:14 +1100
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-31 03:36 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-11-01 09:20 +1100
                Re: Checking large numbers of files (long) Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-11-01 02:23 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-29 21:20 -0700
                Re: Checking large numbers of files Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2016-10-30 17:25 +1100
          Re: Checking large numbers of files Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-30 00:14 -0500
            Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-29 23:02 -0700
          Re: Checking large numbers of files David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-31 12:19 +0100
            Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-31 07:00 -0700
  Re: Checking large numbers of files Ali <abdulrazaq@gmail.com> - 2016-10-30 15:45 -0700
    Re: Checking large numbers of files Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-10-31 03:45 -0700

csiph-web