Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #378269

Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You!

From Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You!
Date 2016-10-27 16:15 +0000
Organization NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID <nut96h0219t@news6.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <80f1487c-fe7c-4db2-86ce-8c46f88dc632@googlegroups.com> <b452ecbb-b895-4155-8261-fc517c596e47@googlegroups.com> <fdece5de-618f-4653-a71b-e6c788f81360@googlegroups.com> <nut1s5018f7@news7.newsguy.com> <5ca1184a-301a-4dee-b25c-915574a138fb@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:41:31 -0700, -hh wrote:

> 
> what you find revolting is anything
> that you actually have to pay real money for.  That's why you'll
> go squander hours of your time to avoid spending ten bucks.  
> 

I've used ALL commercial software.  My expert opinion is that ALL of
it is JUNK.

Time is money, and by investing a bit of time I have paid for a highly
competent document scanning and management system using GNU/Linux
tools.  My system is the BEST that exists anywhere.

Equivalent commercial systems, if they even come close to my system,
are quite lacking.  Technical aspects, such as the compression algorithms
employed, are unknown and beyond user control.  In short, commercial
systems are forced to follow a paradigm of "design for the dummy."

But not my system.  I can compress 8" x 12" documents scanned at 300 dpi
to less than 12 kilobytes, and that beats any commercial capability.

My system, however, is not designed for dummies.  It would never make
it in the commercial market (not that I would ever want it to).  It
requires a deep understanding and vigilance of the document management
and transformation process.  Yet the end results are the best that is
possible to attain with current technology.

In conclusion, one can either purchase off-the-shelf, "turnkey" products
that are largely junk, or one can purchase, in equivalent time units,
much more competent and adaptable systems with open-source, GNU/Linux
software.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-25 21:01 +0000
  Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-26 06:07 -0700
    Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-26 15:17 +0200
      Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 10:18 -0400
        Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-26 17:21 +0200
          Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 11:56 -0400
            Fuck You!  Go to Hell Mr. Maggot ... John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 11:17 -0700
          Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-26 09:02 -0700
            Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 12:11 -0400
              Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 10:21 -0700
            Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-26 23:23 +0200
              Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-26 14:34 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 00:46 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-26 19:07 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-27 09:37 +0100
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 02:47 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 12:08 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 03:16 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 12:34 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 04:08 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:12 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:06 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 16:35 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:44 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-27 07:56 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:11 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 06:06 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 16:34 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:52 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 17:59 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 12:13 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 18:30 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 12:48 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:02 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-27 07:14 -0500
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:21 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 19:27 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 05:36 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 07:54 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:08 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 08:11 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 14:18 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 08:26 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-27 07:20 -0500
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-27 08:51 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-27 11:52 +0100
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 04:15 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-27 07:57 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-27 07:02 -0500
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 19:23 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-27 07:52 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 05:48 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-28 19:18 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-28 13:00 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-27 09:49 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:22 -0700
                Re: Your vote is worth _exactly_ what it cost: nothing. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:58 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 02:19 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-27 11:44 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 03:08 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 07:52 -0400
      Fuck You Idiot! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 07:40 -0700
      Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-26 15:10 +0000
        Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 11:54 -0400
          Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-26 16:09 +0000
    Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-26 10:16 -0400
    Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-26 10:34 -0700
      Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-26 11:08 -0700
        Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 14:10 +0000
          Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 07:41 -0700
            Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 15:03 +0000
              Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 10:11 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 17:33 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 10:47 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-27 13:53 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 19:24 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-10-27 12:36 -0700
            Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-27 16:15 +0000
              Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-28 08:44 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-10-28 13:22 -0700
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-28 23:22 +0200
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-28 23:09 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-10-28 23:23 +0000
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-29 09:18 -0400
                Re: High Maintenance? Fuck You! Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-29 13:32 +0000
  Mjduhgfks, have you always suffered from delusions of persecution, or were you just born stupid? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 07:40 -0700

csiph-web