Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #396869
| From | "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. |
| Date | 2016-10-27 05:53 +1100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nuqu2v$1qik$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <nuoctl$1ia8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4cf9e5a2-5f79-4033-8730-54bdd6cab3d2@googlegroups.com> <nupted$1iae$1@gioia.aioe.org> <41899229-6325-497c-994a-95e3571bf27b@googlegroups.com> |
On 26/10/16 22:51, Gary Harnagel wrote: > On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 at 3:36:16 AM UTC-6, HGWilson, DSc. wrote: > Nope. E = f*f0*sqrt[(1 + v/c)/(1 - v/c)] > > If you're going to pretend to be a scientist, at least be accurate. > >> That's the energy released when light is absorbed. >> It is an expression that in plain words means ARRIVAL RATE OF some kind >> of moving 'OBJECTS' SEPARATED BY THE ABSOLUTE DISTANCE LAMBDA. > > There is no such thing as "absolute distance." The distance between water wave crests is absolute. Just put a boat between them and move it along. >> ....but you wouldn't have the brains to understand that. > > You are sounding more and more like Seto every day. You are sounding more like a complete idiot very day. >> See these dots: ................... o >> Move them sideways at v past o. The frequency their arrival at o is v/l >> where l is the spacing. The dots are not oscillating. > > Dots are not photons. You certainly are confused. I am telling you what the equation means. It isn't my fault if you are too stupid to understand. >> Nobody has ever detected a frequency in light itself. > > And you keep repeating this complete BS after I have given you links to > proof that you are a complete phony baloney-head. Why do you keep pounding > your head against a rock? > > Certain types of apparatus simply measure the arrival rate of particular >> features that are intrinsic to it.... gawd knows what they are.... > > That's the problem with DirtyBaThWater - to many loose ends. One must have > complete suspension of disbelief. If you can explain how a static energy pattern can exist in space then you deserve an immediate Nobel. >>>> which in reality is nothing but a mathematical description of the rate >>>> at which a series of evenly separated spatial features arrive at a >>>> point. Thus, when light impinges on an apparatus at speed c, that >>>> frequency is generated BY THE APPARATUS. >>> >>> Baloney. It is a measure of the energy of impingement. >> >> That is correct. The energy distribution is a static spatial >> arrangement. It hits the apparatus at speed and the apparatus records a >> time periodicity. > > And recordings are reality. > >> Do you understand this basic piece of calculus? dn/dt = dn/dx.dx.dt >> That is what f = c/lambda means > > Can't you even write an equation correctly? It's > > dn/dt = (dn/dx)*(dx/dt) > > It's simply the chain rule. Try this one: > > dE = F*dx = (dp/dt)*dx = (dx/dt)*dp = v*dp > > From Maxwell's equations, E = p*c > > dE = c*dp + p*dc > > dp = dE/c - p*dc/c > > So if dc =/= 0, then dE =/= dE > > BUSTED! ....irrelevant nonsense...stick to the subject please.. >>> Who in the world misconceives that? It may by an UNCOMMON misconception >>> believed by those in DirtyBaThWater. >> >> You just agreed with me when you said it was energy arrival rate. You're >> completely up yourself ! One of the world's true idiots.... > > Are you trying stupidly claim that energy IS intrinsic? Throughout space, at any instant, EM energy is linearly distributed along any line. The pattern is continually changing. An observer passing through any of it will record time fluctuations in the energy received. That is what c/lambda refers to. How energy is distributed is another matter..and it might easily involve a frequency of some kind...but it is NOT c/lambda. Get it?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-26 06:48 +1100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Edgar König <edgko@edgarkoenig.info> - 2016-10-25 19:54 +0000
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-26 20:01 +1100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Walter Bautista <wabau@outlookbay.org> - 2016-10-26 14:28 +0000
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Walter Bautista <wabau@outlookbay.org> - 2016-10-26 14:30 +0000
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-25 13:45 -0700
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-26 20:36 +1100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 04:51 -0700
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-27 05:53 +1100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 18:43 -0700
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-26 06:03 +0000
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-26 20:38 +1100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-10-26 16:05 +0000
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. "HGWilson, DSc." <hgw@....> - 2016-10-27 05:55 +1100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Albert2 <Alber@2.invalid> - 2016-10-28 16:05 +0200
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-10-29 10:43 +1100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Albert2 <Alber@2.invalid> - 2016-11-01 13:19 +0100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-11-02 09:15 +1100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Albert2 <Alber@2.invalid> - 2016-11-04 13:52 +0100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-11-05 09:05 +1100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. Albert2 <Alber@2.invalid> - 2016-11-07 22:30 +0100
Re: Here Is an Important Exerpt From My BaTh Thesis. HGW <hw@....> - 2016-11-08 08:42 +1100
csiph-web