Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #431568
| From | Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts |
| Date | 2016-10-17 09:43 +0000 |
| Organization | "JJ's own news server" |
| Message-ID | <nu26fb$i9p$1@gonzo.alcatraz> (permalink) |
| References | <c156ae15-c4bf-458f-8d1c-d3780a0f14ad@googlegroups.com> |
On 2016-10-16, dakupoto@gmail.com <dakupoto@gmail.com> wrote: > Could some electronics guru please help ? > I am a bit rusty on some RF concepts so I > request some clarifications from the gurus > here. > > By definition, a 4:1 balun has 4 times > the impedance on the balamced side as the > unbalanced side. For any inductor, the > impedance is based on the reactance, which > in turn is based on the frequency of > operation. > > So, what frequency is being considered > here ? The reason I ask is that a balun > could be used as broadband impedance > matching device. Thanks in advance for > your help. A balun is a transformer, a 4:1 balun is a 2:1 ratio transformer. (this suprising relation can be derived from P=I squared R) Useful frequency depends on the design of the transformer. 4:1 baluns good* for 45 to 900 MHZ operations were common in the days of analogue broadcast television. (*) good-enough anyway. -- This email has not been checked by half-arsed antivirus software
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Need clarification on RF related concepts dakupoto@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 23:44 -0700
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-16 04:37 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 05:14 -0700
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-16 08:04 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-10-16 17:36 +0300
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts dakupoto@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 23:27 -0700
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-18 08:44 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-18 11:06 -0400
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-07 13:38 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-11-07 11:00 -0800
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-11-09 19:59 -0800
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-12 08:46 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 11:09 -0800
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-09 18:22 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2016-10-16 14:28 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 04:04 -0400
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2016-10-18 07:00 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-10-18 16:45 +0200
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-10-17 09:43 +0000
csiph-web