Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #431513

Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts

From rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
Subject Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts
Date 2016-10-17 04:04 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nu20lk$8d2$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <c156ae15-c4bf-458f-8d1c-d3780a0f14ad@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/16/2016 2:44 AM, dakupoto@gmail.com wrote:
> Could some electronics guru please help ?
> I am a bit rusty on some RF concepts so I
> request some clarifications from the gurus
> here.
>
> By definition, a 4:1 balun has 4 times
> the impedance on the balamced side as the
> unbalanced side. For any inductor, the
> impedance is based on the reactance, which
> in turn is based on the frequency of
> operation.
>
> So, what frequency is being considered
> here ? The reason I ask is that a balun
> could be used as broadband impedance
> matching device. Thanks in advance for
> your help.

The impedance of a transformer is not the inductive reactance of the 
coils in the transformer.  A transformer reflects the circuit connected 
to the secondary to the primary according to the turns ratio.  The 
voltage and current scales by the turns ratio and the impedance scales 
by the turns ratio squared.

-- 

Rick C

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Need clarification on RF related concepts dakupoto@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 23:44 -0700
  Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-16 04:37 -0500
  Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 05:14 -0700
    Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-16 08:04 -0500
  Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-10-16 17:36 +0300
    Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts dakupoto@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 23:27 -0700
      Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-18 08:44 -0500
        Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-18 11:06 -0400
        Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-07 13:38 -0500
          Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-11-07 11:00 -0800
            Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-09 18:35 -0500
              Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-11-09 19:59 -0800
                Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-12 08:46 -0500
          Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 11:09 -0800
            Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-09 18:22 -0500
  Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2016-10-16 14:28 -0500
  Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 04:04 -0400
    Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2016-10-18 07:00 -0500
      Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-10-18 16:45 +0200
  Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-10-17 09:43 +0000

csiph-web