Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #431513
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts |
| Date | 2016-10-17 04:04 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nu20lk$8d2$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <c156ae15-c4bf-458f-8d1c-d3780a0f14ad@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/16/2016 2:44 AM, dakupoto@gmail.com wrote: > Could some electronics guru please help ? > I am a bit rusty on some RF concepts so I > request some clarifications from the gurus > here. > > By definition, a 4:1 balun has 4 times > the impedance on the balamced side as the > unbalanced side. For any inductor, the > impedance is based on the reactance, which > in turn is based on the frequency of > operation. > > So, what frequency is being considered > here ? The reason I ask is that a balun > could be used as broadband impedance > matching device. Thanks in advance for > your help. The impedance of a transformer is not the inductive reactance of the coils in the transformer. A transformer reflects the circuit connected to the secondary to the primary according to the turns ratio. The voltage and current scales by the turns ratio and the impedance scales by the turns ratio squared. -- Rick C
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Need clarification on RF related concepts dakupoto@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 23:44 -0700
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-16 04:37 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 05:14 -0700
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-16 08:04 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-10-16 17:36 +0300
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts dakupoto@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 23:27 -0700
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-18 08:44 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-18 11:06 -0400
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-07 13:38 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-11-07 11:00 -0800
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-11-09 19:59 -0800
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-12 08:46 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 11:09 -0800
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-09 18:22 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2016-10-16 14:28 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 04:04 -0400
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2016-10-18 07:00 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-10-18 16:45 +0200
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-10-17 09:43 +0000
csiph-web