Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #431479
| From | Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: nice little opamp |
| Date | 2016-10-16 23:42 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nu13a2$3ur$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <3ov40chjncvu0p42sbbmf409obd5otarcl@4ax.com> <ntv03o$iv6$1@dont-email.me> <9la70c13vb5ad05rlicvjkhujklrmc9abm@4ax.com> |
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:49:26 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 04:36:08 -0000 (UTC), Frank Miles
> <fpm@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:19:02 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.onsemi.com/PowerSolutions/product.do?id=NCS2005
>>>
>>> This is rrio, 8 MHz, 32 volts max supply.
>>>
>>> It seems to be c-load stable at 1 uF and up, ceramic or tantalum,
>>> which means it can drive bypassed reference rails and low-current
>>> power rails.
>>>
>>> It rails clean, so will work as a comparator, but above 20 volt supply
>>> the positive clamp gets a little strange.
>>>
>>> 40 cents each by the reel.
>>
>>Maybe my PDF reader is altering things, but I see only stability at 1nF
>>load (in both data sheet and cover - feature list). Transient responses
>>are shown with only ~25pF load. The voltage drift is rendering in uV/C,
>>so the "micro" character seems ok. {This is with both xpdf and evince
>>on a linux system).
>>
>>Perhaps you have some information from a source other than your link?
>>
>>
> I experimented with one. It gets a little fuzzy with 10 nF loads, but
> stabilizes nicely with microfarads.
Ah, from testing. Seems similar to some of the TLx431 family loading
zones.
Hopefully OnSemi won't change their process on you mid-production,
continuing to meet their specs but not your expectations.
> Opamps are fairly unpredictable as regards their c-load behavior. RRO
> parts are often capacitance tolerant, but it depends on how they do the
> internal rolloff. Data sheets used to have internal schematics, which is
> getting rare these days.
Sad. But as long as we buy the devices, the manufacturers will continue
to do this (and probably continue making data sheets less comprehensive).
> My ideal opamp is single SOT23, rrio, low noise, low offset, low bias
> current, fairly fast, c-load tolerant, 3 to 30 volt supply, and cheap.
And low power consumption, and guaranteed availability for ____ time.
Please let us all know when you find this part!
> OPA197 is a candidate, but I haven't tested it yet. It's 67 cents in
> reel quantity. The EMI filtering is nice. It works down to 4.5 volts and
> can output +-40 mA, so it might be worth another 30 cents.
At least this data sheet shows more information regarding C-load behavior.
Thanks,
Frank
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
nice little opamp John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-10-15 12:19 -0700
nice little opamp Phil Hobbs <pcdhobbs@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 13:24 -0700
Re: nice little opamp John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-10-15 14:03 -0700
Re: nice little opamp Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2016-10-15 14:32 -0700
Re: nice little opamp Phil Hobbs <pcdhobbs@gmail.com> - 2016-10-15 14:45 -0700
Re: nice little opamp John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-10-15 15:24 -0700
Re: nice little opamp krw <krw@nowhere.com> - 2016-10-15 20:08 -0400
Re: nice little opamp Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2016-10-16 04:36 +0000
Re: nice little opamp John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> - 2016-10-16 09:49 -0700
Re: nice little opamp Frank Miles <fpm@u.washington.edu> - 2016-10-16 23:42 +0000
csiph-web