Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #431411
| From | amdx <nojunk@knology.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts |
| Date | 2016-10-16 08:04 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ntvts3$8ru$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <c156ae15-c4bf-458f-8d1c-d3780a0f14ad@googlegroups.com> <acbcfd0b-83e0-463b-8098-402330f729db@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/16/2016 7:14 AM, Phil Allison wrote:
> aku...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Could some electronics guru please help ?
>> I am a bit rusty on some RF concepts so I
>> request some clarifications from the gurus
>> here.
>> By definition, a 4:1 balun has 4 times
>> the impedance on the balamced side as the
>> unbalanced side.
> ** Wrong - as per fucking usual.
>> For any inductor, the
>> impedance is based on the reactance, which
>> in turn is based on the frequency of
>> operation.
>>
>> So, what frequency is being considered
>> here ?
> ** It's transformer - not an inductor.
>> The reason I ask is that a balun
>> could be used as broadband impedance
>> matching device. Thanks in advance for
>> your help.
> ** Just like you can use a hammer instead of a screwdriver.
> Works a treat, if you bang hard enough.
>
> FFS, piss of you 1/10 wit troll.
> .... Phil
Well that does seem very helpful,
one of those days* Phil?
Mikek
* a day when you skipped your meds.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Need clarification on RF related concepts dakupoto@gmail.com - 2016-10-15 23:44 -0700
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-16 04:37 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 05:14 -0700
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-16 08:04 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-10-16 17:36 +0300
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts dakupoto@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 23:27 -0700
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts amdx <nojunk@knology.net> - 2016-10-18 08:44 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2016-10-18 11:06 -0400
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-07 13:38 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts George Herold <gherold@teachspin.com> - 2016-11-07 11:00 -0800
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2016-11-09 19:59 -0800
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-12 08:46 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 11:09 -0800
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2016-11-09 18:22 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Tim Wescott <tim@seemywebsite.really> - 2016-10-16 14:28 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 04:04 -0400
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2016-10-18 07:00 -0500
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2016-10-18 16:45 +0200
Re: Need clarification on RF related concepts Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-10-17 09:43 +0000
csiph-web