Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #376226
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because |
| Date | 2016-10-12 20:32 -0400 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <ntmkti$u43$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <ahjdu004.9p8@perch.invalid> <qdadnUJtXOcJmWDKnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <ntj9bs$esi$1@dont-email.me> <ntl23m$9bs$1@dont-email.me> <ntm6d5$esh$4@dont-email.me> |
ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 06:05:14 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > >> ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:26:12 -0400, Marek Novotny wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-10-11, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> // snip >>>> >>>>> Little Beaver loves Mad Magazine. He reviewed at least one issue >>>>> here in cola. >>>> >>>> Seriously? I thought that was a kids magazine. Do adults typically >>>> read Mad magazine? >>> >>> Mad Magazine hasn't been funny for years. >> >> Or maybe you haven't had the ability to have fun for years? > > No. Once Time Warner completely took over Mad, it became "on the nose" > crap. Satire has to have an element of truth. Propaganda and satire don't > work well together. I used to like Mad a lot (in my early adult years) -- > and the change was sudden and complete. It changed from witty satire to > juvenile crap over night. I'm not quite sure I agree. But I haven't read MAD since the "Biggest Idiots of 2012" issue. I tried to find the issue which featured Trump and Alfred E. Neuman with the bad comb-over, but no luck. Now, the Onion, on the other hand, I enjoy regularly. And some of their "articles" are quite mordant; some border on "sick". One can find some H. L. Mencken essays such as http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1757718.Damn_ Damn! (a Book of Calumny) by H.L. Mencken "The average man is far too stupid to make a joke. He may see a joke and love a joke, particularly when it floors and flabbergasts some person he dislikes, but the only way he can himself take part in the priming and pointing of a new one is by acting as its target. In brief, his personal contact with humor tends to fill him with an accumulated sense of disadvantage, of pricked complacency, of sudden and crushing defeat; and so, by an easy psychological process, he is led into the idea that the thing itself is incompatible with true dignity of character and intellect. Hence his deep suspicion of jokers, however adept their thrusts. "What a damned fool!"-this same half-pitying tribute he pays to wit and butt alike. Amazon tries to sell it, but it is actually in the public domain. Barnes and Noble does the same thing; you can find public domain books for "sale", shown in searches right alongside their cost-burdened appropriations of public domain content. Now, a question: Are our assclown trolls "wit", or "butt"? You decide. Anyway, you can find a copy, free, in a number of formats here, unencumbered by some corporations "monetization": https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/18948 If George Washington were alive today, what a shining mark he would be for the whole camorra of uplifters, forward-lookers and professional patriots! He was the Rockefeller of his time, the richest man in the United States, a promoter of stock companies, a land-grabber, an exploiter of mines and timber. He was a bitter opponent of foreign alliances, and denounced their evils in harsh, specific terms. He had a liking for all forthright and pugnacious men, and a contempt for lawyers, schoolmasters and all other such obscurantists. He was not pious. He drank whisky whenever he felt chilly, and kept a jug of it handy. He knew far more profanity than Scripture, and used and enjoyed it more. He had no belief in the infallible wisdom of the common people, but regarded them as inflammatory dolts, and tried to save the republic from them. He advocated no sure cure for all the sorrows of the world, and doubted that such a panacea existed. He took no interest in the private morals of his neighbors. Inhabiting These States today, George would be ineligible for any office of honor or profit. The Senate would never dare confirm him; the President would not think of nominating him. He would be on trial in all the yellow journals for belonging to the Invisible Government, the Hell Hounds of Plutocracy, the Money Power, the Interests. The Sherman Act would have him in its toils; he would be under indictment by every grand jury south of the Potomac; the triumphant prohibitionists of his native state would be denouncing him (he had a still at Mount Vernon) as a debaucher of youth, a recruiting officer for insane asylums, a poisoner of the home. The suffragettes would be on his trail, with sentinels posted all along the Accotink road. The initiators and referendors would be bawling for his blood. The young college men of the Nation and the New Republic would be lecturing him weekly. He would be used to scare children in Kansas and Arkansas. The chautauquas would shiver whenever his name was mentioned.... And what a chance there would be for that ambitious young district attorney who thought to shadow him on his peregrinations—and grab him under the Mann Act! Hilarious stuff! -- It is right that he too should have his little chronicle, his memories, his reason, and be able to recognize the good in the bad, the bad in the worst, and so grow gently old all down the unchanging days and die one day like any other day, only shorter. -- Samuel Beckett, "Malone Dies"
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux Fails Because Bozzo Rink <bozzo@graduate.org> - 2016-10-06 04:33 +0000
Re: Linux Fails Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-06 09:49 +0200
Re: Linux Fails Because Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 10:08 -0700
Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-06 06:30 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 10:04 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-06 10:15 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-06 10:29 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-06 12:16 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 13:51 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 14:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-07 15:24 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-07 19:30 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-07 20:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 00:53 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 05:35 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 13:34 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-08 08:44 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 08:57 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:16 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 15:39 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 22:35 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 21:52 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:40 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 01:07 +0000
Linux Trolls Succeed when you help them bypass filters Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-09 08:12 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-09 13:16 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 10:16 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 10:23 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-08 10:36 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 15:38 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 21:12 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 17:27 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 21:37 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:38 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-10 18:02 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 00:04 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 15:10 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 15:21 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:31 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:22 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 11:26 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 15:31 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:40 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 16:38 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 09:42 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 18:54 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 16:56 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 11:33 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-11 17:56 +0200
Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are Satire-Impaired Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-11 19:11 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are Satire-Impaired Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-10-11 19:32 -0400
Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are MAD Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 06:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because They Are Satire-Impaired chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-12 07:14 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 16:04 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 12:18 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 16:55 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 13:04 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 19:10 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 13:19 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 17:18 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 19:19 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-11 12:25 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-11 17:28 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 18:02 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 18:00 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-11 20:57 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 15:12 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 19:49 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-11 19:18 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 13:24 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-11 18:42 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-11 15:09 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 16:29 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 14:08 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 17:38 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 14:45 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-11 19:01 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-22 10:05 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-25 10:03 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-28 08:28 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because deplorable owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-10-28 14:56 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-29 09:02 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 12:01 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 18:00 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 06:05 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 20:28 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-12 20:32 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 12:49 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 15:01 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 13:23 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 15:51 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 14:19 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 16:32 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 14:42 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 17:12 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 10:45 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 15:51 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-17 11:34 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-13 15:49 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:07 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-14 12:22 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-14 14:43 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-14 12:52 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-13 09:40 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-13 15:07 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 16:16 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 09:30 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:06 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-14 06:59 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 07:31 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 09:17 -0700
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-13 08:59 -0500
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-13 16:05 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-14 20:18 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 03:05 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-20 20:19 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-08 17:40 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 22:41 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-08 18:49 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-08 23:04 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-08 19:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-08 20:39 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 10:42 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 15:47 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-08 12:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-08 20:49 +0200
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 15:17 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:21 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-10-08 16:43 +0100
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 15:50 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-08 15:10 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-08 19:49 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-10-09 10:13 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-09 10:19 -0400
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:22 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-10-09 15:20 +0000
Re: Linux Trolls Fail Because Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-07 17:19 -0400
Re: Linux Fails Because Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 11:11 -0700
csiph-web