Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #599372

Re: h-bar is h over twice pi

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/4/2016 2:50 AM, poraty350@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, October 1, 2016 at 11:52:09 PM UTC+3, Odd Bodkin wrote:

>>>>> ========================
>>>>
>>>> Just a couple of comments.
>>>>
>>>> 1.Planck did not perform any experiments here. He was a theorist, trying
>>>> to explain data taken by other physicists.
>>> ==========================
>>> who are those physicist "
>>> or else you are mumblimg !!
>>> and  why h f is related to Planck ??
>>> ---
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. Planck did not plot E vs f and call the slope h. That wasn't he point
>>>> of his exercise at all. What he was doing was considering the
>>>> distribution of energy emitted by oscillators of frequency f. It had
>>>> been assumed up until that point that light could come in ANY amount of
>>>> e

> =====================
> idiot crock !!!
>
> where in all **your formula
> for   **net again net ** photon energy
>
> you have any
> F en zero multiplier
> or any ]
> F en relativistic   multiplier
> to the MASS dimension ??!!!

As I said, I have no interest in your feeble and misguided attempts to 
do physics with dimensional analysis. You don't know what you're doing.

In the meantime, you have made a number of mistakes talking about the 
history of what Planck actually did, and you should really have taken 
the time to read up on what he actually did before opening your big yap 
with a guess.

>
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ===================================
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

THE PHOTON HAS - NO MORE, NOT  LESS ENERGY -THAN  E=h f - WHAT DOES THAT MEAN ??!! poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-09-28 16:47 -0700
  Re: THE PHOTON HAS - NO MORE, NOT  LESS ENERGY -THAN  E=h f - WHAT DOES THAT MEAN ??!! "Sam Smith" <moderator@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 07:16 -0700
  h-bar is h over twice pi noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:04 -0700
    Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-09-30 09:05 -0700
      Re: h-bar is h over twice pi Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 11:30 -0500
        ask why not, why noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 13:45 -0700
          Re: ask why not, why Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:52 +0200
            Re: ask why not, why poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-01 01:52 -0700
              Re: ask why not, why Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 11:03 +0200
                Re: ask why not, why poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-01 03:21 -0700
                Re: ask why not, why Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:49 +0200
                Re: ask why not, why noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 13:42 -0700
                Re: ask why not, why Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 22:55 +0200
                Re: ask why not, why rbrteline@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 13:11 -0700
        Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-01 00:30 -0700
          Re: h-bar is h over twice pi Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:52 -0500
            Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 00:50 -0700
              Re: h-bar is h over twice pi Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:31 -0500
                Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 09:05 -0700
                Re: h-bar is h over twice pi Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:56 -0500
                Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 11:11 -0700
                Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 23:02 -0700
              (where is, isn't equality?)  h-bar is h over twice pi noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 10:41 -0700
                Re: (where is, isn't equality?)  h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 23:33 -0700

csiph-web