Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #599030
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: ask why not, why |
| Date | 2016-10-01 11:03 +0200 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <nsnu5d$uol$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <73035806-4c89-4637-aa5c-eb81f8c505ea@googlegroups.com> <nsm3ub$1uqf$1@gioia.aioe.org> <23f30e76-8f6e-4d00-ab86-4bc9a5ed0289@googlegroups.com> <nsnpvc$jdc$1@dont-email.me> <34d515e4-c0ec-4152-b47b-630acc2aff3b@googlegroups.com> |
Dne 01/10/2016 v 10:52 poraty350@gmail.com napsal(a): > בתאריך יום שבת, 1 באוקטובר 2016 בשעה 10:52:28 UTC+3, מאת Poutnik Fornntp: >> >> E = h . f = h_bar . omega >> >> To avoid explicit 2.pi, resp (2.pi)^n factor >> in the wave equation context, >> it is advantage to work with angular velocity, >> rather than with frequency. >> >> ====================== > so you say that h f > is not good enough for you ? > it gives other quantitative e result ?? > No, you say it, but I do not know why. Where scientists work with f, it is more convenient to use h. Where scientists work with omega, it is more convenient to use h_bar. No big deal. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
THE PHOTON HAS - NO MORE, NOT LESS ENERGY -THAN E=h f - WHAT DOES THAT MEAN ??!! poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-09-28 16:47 -0700
Re: THE PHOTON HAS - NO MORE, NOT LESS ENERGY -THAN E=h f - WHAT DOES THAT MEAN ??!! "Sam Smith" <moderator@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 07:16 -0700
h-bar is h over twice pi noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-29 11:04 -0700
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-09-30 09:05 -0700
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 11:30 -0500
ask why not, why noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 13:45 -0700
Re: ask why not, why Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:52 +0200
Re: ask why not, why poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-01 01:52 -0700
Re: ask why not, why Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 11:03 +0200
Re: ask why not, why poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-01 03:21 -0700
Re: ask why not, why Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:49 +0200
Re: ask why not, why noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 13:42 -0700
Re: ask why not, why Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 22:55 +0200
Re: ask why not, why rbrteline@gmail.com - 2016-10-03 13:11 -0700
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-01 00:30 -0700
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 15:52 -0500
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 00:50 -0700
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-04 07:31 -0500
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-04 09:05 -0700
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 09:56 -0500
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 11:11 -0700
Re: h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-06 23:02 -0700
(where is, isn't equality?) h-bar is h over twice pi noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 10:41 -0700
Re: (where is, isn't equality?) h-bar is h over twice pi poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-10-05 23:33 -0700
csiph-web