Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373835

Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial

From	Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial
Date	2016-09-30 17:52 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nsmmpv$495$6@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <nsmd0d$3th$2@dont-email.me> <D41409A6.7F04D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nsmf1h$c9g$1@dont-email.me> <x6ydnXl0IY8oUnPKnZ2dnUU7-WnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <nsmjpg$sse$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2016-09-30 5:00 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Marek Novotny wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-09-30, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
>> wrote:
>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>>> 
>>>> On 9/30/16, 12:04 PM, in article nsmd0d$3th$2@dont-email.me,
>>>> "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The "goal" is to annoy you.
>>>> 
>>>> Sadly I believe you... the goal of you and your herd is to
>>>> annoy those who are not a part of your herd. Even when the
>>>> focus is even slightly on tech, such as how to use
>>>> encryption, all you guys really want is to find a way to
>>>> annoy others. It is a sickness with you.
>>>> 
>>>> But, and I mean this, I appreciate you finally being honest
>>>> about it. It is what I have been saying for a long time.
>>>> 
>>>> Meanwhile I would love to see a greater focus on technology.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Idiot. This has been *all* about technology. And you failed
>>> miserably. As you always do when it comes to real technology
>>> and not your typical bullshit about converting kooking websites
>>> to PDF to send them via mail or other lunatic tripe
>>> 
>>> Those posts show *every time* how utterly incompetent you are,
>>> and you know that as well. They show your shameless lies when
>>> you claim that you rather "talk about technology". You can't,
>>> and it is shown here brightly lit
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>>> Don't you think that sending of encrypted posts would stop at
>>> once if you would be able to hire someone knowledgeable about
>>> technology to set up your rig for PGP? Your problem is that you
>>> are broke, and nobody having any selfrespect would work for
>>> you, paid or not
>> 
>> Setting up gpg won't help him. He'd need a public key and each
>> member would have to accept it and commit to encrypting against
>> it. If I encrypt against Owl's public key only, then only owl can
>> read it. So unlike the group being open and unmoderated, the
>> encryption lets the poster decide who can read the post. It's
>> essentially a white-list.
>> 
> 
> The lying imbecile would try to show up as someone new and post
> reasonably for two or three weeks to get accepting as being
> genuine. It would be a nearly impossible feat for that lunatic
> cretin, but he would try. He has shown restraint in CSMA also, at
> least for a while

ROFL #1

> We would try to get on that list, and then the trolling would start
> all over. Until new keys would have been generated, but Snit
> Michael Glasser would see that as a "victory" of sorts. The way it
> is now is the worst imaginable for him. He can't read the posts, he
> is left out in the cold and he can do absolutely nothing about it.
> 
> Even his lame attempts of activating his socks are so openly
> declaring defeat that he had better left them in his stinking ass

ROFL #2

- -- 
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX7t6LAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uHiYH/RSPqAfwJu2ydlNMIcXL6PdC
g/5PkkKUDCq0MLY2i5QFfY3inzh0V/rX0W0Plq5V2708TjdT+eYmZx8M8b0d/BSk
+vmUpk99JguQAqYGb24DWS1acOqD0MoGA36OIT0w1+8CB9iJWcndnRjJULtYNouS
C3YCI6U2azFoOVo1utEw8es71fJZ8wY6+nI5KPvEJfkiuYvGiYwodwJm7IX0IaWb
eRcCt8jgvSU1UMySV46vaMQHOFFR/Iq09Iu0EHa8n1VbPSOeJuSuPzVwtiUJZkZx
JAPUgQV63pAVnZDbMzZxSIlW/PoZQbALryWr3RQIarPkRUqD2NuHpO8RtZ7dSUM=
=8Gho
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thread

Public vs Private Key Tutorial Bozzo Rink <bozzo@graduate.org> - 2016-09-30 14:29 +0000
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:50 +0200
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:05 -0400
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 19:05 +0200
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 20:12 +0200
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:09 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 20:50 +0000
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 01:12 +0200
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:17 -0400
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 20:22 +0000
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:32 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 14:13 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:22 +0000
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 19:47 +0200
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:59 +0000
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:05 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:40 +0200
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 00:40 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:21 -0400
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 18:04 -0400
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:22 -0400
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 00:37 +0000
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 14:46 +0200
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 09:56 -0700
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-01 17:40 -0400
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 14:43 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:04 +0200
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:39 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:24 -0400
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 20:48 +0000
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 23:00 +0200
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:29 +0000
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 23:46 +0200
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:51 +0000
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:52 -0400
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:47 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:13 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:20 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:01 -0600
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 07:54 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:58 +0200
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:05 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:24 +0000
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:09 -0400
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:45 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-09-30 22:42 +0000
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-01 03:09 +0000
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-01 09:33 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:22 -0700
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:03 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:10 -0700
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:21 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:27 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:09 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:16 -0600
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:15 -0600
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 09:19 -0700

csiph-web