Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373832

Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial

From Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial
Date 2016-09-30 17:47 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nsmmhr$495$4@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <D413F9BC.7F011%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nsmd0d$3th$2@dont-email.me> <D41409A6.7F04D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nsmf1h$c9g$1@dont-email.me> <x6ydnXl0IY8oUnPKnZ2dnUU7-WnNnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2016-09-30 4:48 PM, Marek Novotny wrote:
> On 2016-09-30, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>> 
>>> On 9/30/16, 12:04 PM, in article nsmd0d$3th$2@dont-email.me,
>>> "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The "goal" is to annoy you.
>>> 
>>> Sadly I believe you... the goal of you and your herd is to
>>> annoy those who are not a part of your herd. Even when the
>>> focus is even slightly on tech, such as how to use encryption,
>>> all you guys really want is to find a way to annoy others. It
>>> is a sickness with you.
>>> 
>>> But, and I mean this, I appreciate you finally being honest
>>> about it. It is what I have been saying for a long time.
>>> 
>>> Meanwhile I would love to see a greater focus on technology.
>>> 
>> 
>> Idiot. This has been *all* about technology. And you failed
>> miserably. As you always do when it comes to real technology and
>> not your typical bullshit about converting kooking websites to
>> PDF to send them via mail or other lunatic tripe
>> 
>> Those posts show *every time* how utterly incompetent you are,
>> and you know that as well. They show your shameless lies when you
>> claim that you rather "talk about technology". You can't, and it
>> is shown here brightly lit
> 
> +1
> 
>> Don't you think that sending of encrypted posts would stop at
>> once if you would be able to hire someone knowledgeable about
>> technology to set up your rig for PGP? Your problem is that you
>> are broke, and nobody having any selfrespect would work for you,
>> paid or not
> 
> Setting up gpg won't help him. He'd need a public key and each
> member would have to accept it and commit to encrypting against it.
> If I encrypt against Owl's public key only, then only owl can read
> it. So unlike the group being open and unmoderated, the encryption
> lets the poster decide who can read the post. It's essentially a
> white-list.

There's no way in Hell that anyone here who has accepted a future of
encryption would allow the Prescott Parasite to see the posts. It's a
good strategy and it will rid us all of the thing forever. Not only
that but it suddenly turns an incredibly insecure forum into a very
private and very secure one which would be Hell to decrypt for even
the most insistent party. A single post would take a crapload of
processing and there are lots and lots of useless posts on Usenet.
Finding just ONE which would be of interest to the authorities would
take decades.


- -- 
Silver Slimer
Islam is a disease
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX7t2HAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+ufp4H+gONnlxIP3ls+l+K7ECY6dSA
69Jzkye6ev0YPLSVy6y9PR7a8GfOfMkvn1qY2mF/8C7KUiZxCml6BMu23CKptYaD
V/7lXIDd5DwMJYRueA4D1K/QUM0GjrXtAe05XEcFLP9xK4Knk8QTxRpM1806HYsc
49JCymoKKO2XRPzw6NFreK8ynPESQ/QlsQhKj5g8aFvexHcZy/8uEhx0nrykb/8q
IN1DfAshHoYG8OCT+z8oMGK2eYhm3ZYR//xf0t61SZhC5nz4ldblVeYYk2PGWbpv
zGI+MnWEJnrzU5Q1MgSONz7y5SRGE6SwYDfyOf8wgjKX6bXO7tKNWg4r+VVnm4Y=
=cp1O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Public vs Private Key Tutorial Bozzo Rink <bozzo@graduate.org> - 2016-09-30 14:29 +0000
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:50 +0200
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:05 -0400
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 19:05 +0200
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 20:12 +0200
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:09 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 20:50 +0000
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 01:12 +0200
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:17 -0400
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 20:22 +0000
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:32 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 14:13 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:22 +0000
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 19:47 +0200
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:59 +0000
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:05 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:40 +0200
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 00:40 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:21 -0400
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 18:04 -0400
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:22 -0400
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 00:37 +0000
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 14:46 +0200
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 09:56 -0700
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-01 17:40 -0400
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 14:43 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:04 +0200
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:39 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:24 -0400
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 20:48 +0000
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 23:00 +0200
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:29 +0000
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 23:46 +0200
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:51 +0000
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:52 -0400
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:47 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:13 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:20 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:01 -0600
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 07:54 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:58 +0200
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:05 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:24 +0000
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:09 -0400
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:45 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-09-30 22:42 +0000
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-01 03:09 +0000
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-01 09:33 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:22 -0700
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:03 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:10 -0700
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:21 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:27 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:09 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:16 -0600
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:15 -0600
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 09:19 -0700

csiph-web