Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373832
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial |
| Date | 2016-09-30 17:47 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nsmmhr$495$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <D413F9BC.7F011%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nsmd0d$3th$2@dont-email.me> <D41409A6.7F04D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nsmf1h$c9g$1@dont-email.me> <x6ydnXl0IY8oUnPKnZ2dnUU7-WnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2016-09-30 4:48 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-09-30, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 9/30/16, 12:04 PM, in article nsmd0d$3th$2@dont-email.me, >>> "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>>> The "goal" is to annoy you. >>> >>> Sadly I believe you... the goal of you and your herd is to >>> annoy those who are not a part of your herd. Even when the >>> focus is even slightly on tech, such as how to use encryption, >>> all you guys really want is to find a way to annoy others. It >>> is a sickness with you. >>> >>> But, and I mean this, I appreciate you finally being honest >>> about it. It is what I have been saying for a long time. >>> >>> Meanwhile I would love to see a greater focus on technology. >>> >> >> Idiot. This has been *all* about technology. And you failed >> miserably. As you always do when it comes to real technology and >> not your typical bullshit about converting kooking websites to >> PDF to send them via mail or other lunatic tripe >> >> Those posts show *every time* how utterly incompetent you are, >> and you know that as well. They show your shameless lies when you >> claim that you rather "talk about technology". You can't, and it >> is shown here brightly lit > > +1 > >> Don't you think that sending of encrypted posts would stop at >> once if you would be able to hire someone knowledgeable about >> technology to set up your rig for PGP? Your problem is that you >> are broke, and nobody having any selfrespect would work for you, >> paid or not > > Setting up gpg won't help him. He'd need a public key and each > member would have to accept it and commit to encrypting against it. > If I encrypt against Owl's public key only, then only owl can read > it. So unlike the group being open and unmoderated, the encryption > lets the poster decide who can read the post. It's essentially a > white-list. There's no way in Hell that anyone here who has accepted a future of encryption would allow the Prescott Parasite to see the posts. It's a good strategy and it will rid us all of the thing forever. Not only that but it suddenly turns an incredibly insecure forum into a very private and very secure one which would be Hell to decrypt for even the most insistent party. A single post would take a crapload of processing and there are lots and lots of useless posts on Usenet. Finding just ONE which would be of interest to the authorities would take decades. - -- Silver Slimer Islam is a disease -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX7t2HAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+ufp4H+gONnlxIP3ls+l+K7ECY6dSA 69Jzkye6ev0YPLSVy6y9PR7a8GfOfMkvn1qY2mF/8C7KUiZxCml6BMu23CKptYaD V/7lXIDd5DwMJYRueA4D1K/QUM0GjrXtAe05XEcFLP9xK4Knk8QTxRpM1806HYsc 49JCymoKKO2XRPzw6NFreK8ynPESQ/QlsQhKj5g8aFvexHcZy/8uEhx0nrykb/8q IN1DfAshHoYG8OCT+z8oMGK2eYhm3ZYR//xf0t61SZhC5nz4ldblVeYYk2PGWbpv zGI+MnWEJnrzU5Q1MgSONz7y5SRGE6SwYDfyOf8wgjKX6bXO7tKNWg4r+VVnm4Y= =cp1O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Public vs Private Key Tutorial Bozzo Rink <bozzo@graduate.org> - 2016-09-30 14:29 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:50 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:05 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 19:05 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 20:12 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:09 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 20:50 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 01:12 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:17 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:32 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 14:13 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:22 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 19:47 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:59 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:05 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:40 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 00:40 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:21 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 18:04 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:22 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 00:37 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 14:46 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 09:56 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-01 17:40 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 14:43 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:04 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:39 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:24 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 20:48 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 23:00 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:29 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 23:46 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:51 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:52 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:47 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:13 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:20 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:01 -0600
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 07:54 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:58 +0200
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:05 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:24 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:09 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:45 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-09-30 22:42 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-01 03:09 +0000
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-01 09:33 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:22 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:03 -0400
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:10 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:21 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:27 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:09 -0700
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:16 -0600
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:15 -0600
Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 09:19 -0700
csiph-web