Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373831

Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial

From	Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial
Date	2016-09-30 23:46 +0200
Organization	DNLA GmbH
Message-ID	<nsmmfs$5jf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <D41409A6.7F04D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nsmf1h$c9g$1@dont-email.me> <x6ydnXl0IY8oUnPKnZ2dnUU7-WnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <nsmjpg$sse$1@dont-email.me> <p_GdnSx0Y9_JRHPKnZ2dnUU7-c3NnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Marek Novotny wrote:

> On 2016-09-30, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>> Marek Novotny wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-09-30, Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
>>>>
>>>>> On 9/30/16, 12:04 PM, in article nsmd0d$3th$2@dont-email.me, "Peter
>>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The "goal" is to annoy you.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sadly I believe you... the goal of you and your herd is to annoy those
>>>>> who are not a part of your herd. Even when the focus is even slightly
>>>>> on tech, such as how to use encryption, all you guys really want is to
>>>>> find a way to annoy others. It is a sickness with you.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But, and I mean this, I appreciate you finally being honest about it.
>>>>> It is what I have been saying for a long time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Meanwhile I would love to see a greater focus on technology.
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>> Idiot. This has been *all* about technology. And you failed miserably.
>>>> As you always do when it comes to real technology and not your typical
>>>> bullshit about converting kooking websites to PDF to send them via mail
>>>> or other lunatic tripe
>>>>
>>>> Those posts show *every time* how utterly incompetent you are, and you
>>>> know that as well. They show your shameless lies when you claim that
>>>> you rather "talk about technology". You can't, and it is shown here
>>>> brightly lit
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>>> Don't you think that sending of encrypted posts would stop at once if
>>>> you would be able to hire someone knowledgeable about technology to set
>>>> up your rig for PGP? Your problem is that you are broke, and nobody
>>>> having any selfrespect would work for you, paid or not
>>> 
>>> Setting up gpg won't help him. He'd need a public key and each member
>>> would have to accept it and commit to encrypting against it. If I
>>> encrypt against Owl's public key only, then only owl can read it. So
>>> unlike the group being open and unmoderated, the encryption lets the
>>> poster decide who can read the post. It's essentially a white-list.
>>> 
>>
>> The lying imbecile would try to show up as someone new and post
>> reasonably for two or three weeks to get accepting as being genuine.
>> It would be a nearly impossible feat for that lunatic cretin, but he
>> would try. He has shown restraint in CSMA also, at least for a while
>>
>> We would try to get on that list, and then the trolling would start all
>> over.
>> Until new keys would have been generated, but Snit Michael Glasser would
>> see that as a "victory" of sorts.
> 
> except that new keys do not need to be generated. Assuming I let a snit
> sock into my group, all I'd have to do is remove his public key from my
> group and my future messages to that group would no longer be encrypted
> against Snit's sock puppet. He'd be cut off as easily as he was dealt
> in. I can cut anyone in my group off from my posts and they can all do
> the same to me. We are each in control of who can decrypt our individual
> posts.
> 
>> The way it is now is the worst imaginable for him. He can't read the
>> posts, he is left out in the cold and he can do absolutely nothing about
>> it.
> 
> Correct. No sock he makes will gain my trust. I already know the actors
> and I'm not accepting new applicants at this time. :)
> 
>> Even his lame attempts of activating his socks are so openly declaring
>> defeat that he had better left them in his stinking ass
> 
> He watch's too much Pets.com.
> 

You are right. I did not think of just removing his key from your keychain

But I am not that certain about "new actors". If acted extremely well, he 
would have a tiny chance of being accepted.

It would be extremely tiny, naturally. Flatfish Gary Stewart was a master in 
that regard, and he has *never* fooled me. It took only a few posts until I 
knew it was him. With Snit Michael Glasser it is far more easy. He is way 
too stupid to build a convincing charade

Thread

Public vs Private Key Tutorial Bozzo Rink <bozzo@graduate.org> - 2016-09-30 14:29 +0000
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:50 +0200
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:05 -0400
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 19:05 +0200
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 20:12 +0200
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:09 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 20:50 +0000
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 01:12 +0200
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:17 -0400
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 20:22 +0000
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:32 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 14:13 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:22 +0000
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 19:47 +0200
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:59 +0000
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:05 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:40 +0200
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 00:40 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:21 -0400
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 18:04 -0400
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:22 -0400
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 00:37 +0000
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-10-01 14:46 +0200
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 09:56 -0700
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-11-01 17:40 -0400
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-11-01 14:43 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:04 +0200
          Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 21:39 +0200
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:24 -0400
            Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 20:48 +0000
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 23:00 +0200
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:29 +0000
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 23:46 +0200
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-30 21:51 +0000
                Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:52 -0400
              Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:47 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:13 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:20 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:01 -0600
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 07:54 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-30 16:58 +0200
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:11 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:05 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 17:24 +0000
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 16:09 -0400
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 08:45 -0700
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-09-30 22:42 +0000
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-10-01 03:09 +0000
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-10-01 09:33 -0400
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-10-01 09:22 -0700
  Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 12:03 -0400
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:10 -0700
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:21 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 09:27 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-30 10:09 -0700
        Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:16 -0600
      Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:15 -0600
    Re: Public vs Private Key Tutorial Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-30 09:19 -0700

csiph-web