Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #50861
| From | Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? |
| Date | 2016-09-11 14:57 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nr4cul$7nc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <nr1aj9$bho$1@dont-email.me> <bc36f094-c73f-4887-976c-6ce0fdfdefd6@googlegroups.com> <87h99mj1qx.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <nr37r8$664$1@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl> <874m5mi6en.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> |
On 9/11/2016 2:27 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: > albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) writes: >> Of course there was a working Forth. It was one of the FIG-Forth targets. >> Not only that, it is a very decent processor for Forth. > > Oh cool. For some reason I thought 1802 systems (I never used one) had > a very limited amount of memory, like 2k. But I see on Wikipedia that > the 1802 had a 16-bit address space. How much ram were 1802 Forth > systems typically configured with, if anyone knows? > I remember seeing units with 64K of RAM minus a small amount for EPROMS. Don't ask me which ones as it was too long ago and not an item of interest at the time. -- Cecil - k5nwa
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-07 11:24 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-08 11:57 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-09-09 13:48 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-10 00:19 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 00:48 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-10 04:06 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-09-10 13:37 +0100
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-10 08:47 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-10 11:45 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-10 21:44 +0200
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-10 15:10 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-09-10 19:24 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-10 21:31 +0200
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-10 13:27 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 16:32 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 16:37 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 19:46 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-16 18:40 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-16 22:20 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 15:30 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-18 16:42 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-18 18:30 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-10-18 23:23 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 03:23 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 00:51 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-19 01:08 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2016-10-19 17:19 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-20 00:43 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-10-20 10:00 +0100
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-20 19:09 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-10-21 13:14 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-21 16:31 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-10-22 14:28 -0400
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-22 12:14 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-12-22 02:21 -0800
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-12-23 11:47 -0800
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-10-21 15:07 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-22 00:09 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-10-16 17:17 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Jan Coombs <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> - 2016-09-10 22:10 +0100
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-10 10:58 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-11 00:03 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-11 01:10 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2016-09-11 11:23 +0200
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-11 12:27 -0700
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Cecil Bayona <cbayona@cbayona.com> - 2016-09-11 14:57 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2016-09-11 05:13 -0500
Re: BBC MicroBit has arrived - which Forth in Python is recommended for now? JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2016-09-11 04:51 -0700
csiph-web