Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #593894
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! |
| Date | 2016-08-19 21:54 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <np8gpi$mab$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <57b77362$0$4510$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> <np7vv1$475$1@gioia.aioe.org> <qllk8d-4sb.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
On 8/19/2016 7:43 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> On 8/19/2016 4:00 PM, benj wrote: >>> We've all seen the news about the weather. And we are all also familiar >>> with Bert's theory of "heavy air" that has been predicting bad weather >>> for years. And most of us are are aware of fundamental physics >>> principles like the 4 elements: Earth air Fire and water. >>> >>> Heavy air theory clearly states that all elements are conserved! Thus, >>> it is obvious that if Kalifornia is covered in wildfires, that for the >>> conservation theory to hold (Noether's theorem) that somewhere else >>> there must be states covered in water to balance it all out. >>> >>> And that is exactly what we see to day! This is proof beyond question >>> that the theory of Heavy Air is correct! >> >> google "Heavy Air Theory" and you run right into Bert, very famous now. > > I did and no mention of Bert on the first 2 pages of results. > > I believe that google presents stuff you have searched on before up front. JSH a troll in the math group about 5 years ago would always search on his name, works and stuff, and he indicated it was always on the first page or two which he interpeted that Google scored it as the most searched, or everyone was looking at his stuff. He was fooling himself for years, then it sank in, and he evaporated. But when you search for it for the first time it could not be found. also significantlly unique phrases will stand out, "Heavy Air Theory" is one of those
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-19 17:00 -0400
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 17:07 -0500
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-19 19:39 -0400
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-20 00:43 +0000
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-19 21:54 -0500
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-20 20:43 -0400
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-21 01:16 +0000
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-22 16:49 -0400
Re: "Heavy Air" right-on again! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-22 21:59 +0000
csiph-web