Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #591643

Re: why no Electric Field? Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations

From Snowshoe <no@spam.please>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: why no Electric Field? Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations
Date 2016-08-02 10:25 -0400
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nnqa8h$dpl$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <6f40348d-3c34-4690-9b3a-65caa277aa22@googlegroups.com> <a11b2b18-ce9c-4935-992b-d44a85b07938@googlegroups.com> <4753c735-143e-4ed7-a714-f706e1075fa9@googlegroups.com> <891ad1ed-c75a-40f4-a50a-c412e3dbd214@googlegroups.com> <1e5562ba-1446-4597-994e-38e0f8cdbd00@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 8/1/2016 5:07 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Alright, I have to make a very strong, very strong case that there is no Electric Field but rather there is a electric current.


Why do you say that?  What do you think the E is in the div(E) and 
curl(E) equations?  Specifically div(E)=r_E is the action of static 
unmoving electric charges (r_E).

It is the J_E term that represents current or the flow of charge, 
creating a magnetic field, curl(B).

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-07-30 22:51 -0700
  deep look into law of electricity and magnetism Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 12:53 -0700
    1st Maxwell Equation that defines lines-of-force and photon Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 14:22 -0700
      1st Maxwell Equation that defines lines-of-force and photon Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 15:46 -0700
        1st Maxwell Equation that defines lines-of-force and photon Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 18:21 -0700
          Re: 1st Maxwell Equation that defines lines-of-force and photon Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 21:27 -0700
          Rival theory-- CANCER CREATING ORGANS in Biology Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 22:00 -0700
            Rival theory-- CANCER CREATING ORGANS in Biology Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 00:59 -0700
              why no Electric Field? Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 14:07 -0700
                why no Electric Field? Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 20:21 -0700
                does magnets bend photons, light waves? Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-01 22:37 -0700
                recap of where I am Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 01:31 -0700
                Re: recap of where I am Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 01:52 -0700
                details on spin of electron and spin of Earth Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 02:14 -0700
                Re: details on spin of electron and spin of Earth Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 09:30 -0700
                Re: details on spin of electron and spin of Earth Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 11:07 -0700
                Re: why no Electric Field? Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Snowshoe <no@spam.please> - 2016-08-02 10:25 -0400
                Law of Electricity has to define current Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 13:01 -0700
                explaining superconductivity and Doppler redshift from Law of Magnetism Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 23:45 -0700
                magnetism not motion, causes redshift Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 01:01 -0700
                current needs to appear in Law of Electricity first, not by the time we reach Faraday law Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2016-08-02 14:23 -0700
                Re: current needs to appear in Law of Electricity first, not by the time we reach Faraday law Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations Snowshoe <no@spam.please> - 2016-08-02 21:55 -0400
                Re: current needs to appear in Law of Electricity first, not by the time we reach Faraday law Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-03 05:28 +0000
                Re: current needs to appear in Law of Electricity first, not by the time we reach Faraday law Re: TALK; Atom Totality textbook, 7th edition, straightening out Maxwell Equations noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 12:42 -0700

csiph-web