Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #35104
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: plugin architecture |
| Date | 2016-07-22 23:50 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nmuphi$92v$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <f6628337-f13e-4a4f-8a4c-fa005d7a7747@googlegroups.com> |
On 7/20/2016 2:29 AM, Philipp Kraus wrote: > I'm searching for an indea for a plugin architecture. I have found > PF4J, OOGI and JPF. What about using what is in Java SE aka ServiceLoader (see http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/ServiceLoader.html). Or do what a lot of people are doing: just use Spring to load the plugin. Or do you really need some advanced features with versioning, dependencies, unload etc.? > At the moment I have got a question: Is it a good idea, > that one Jar file store multiple plugins or is it better that one > plugin is represent by one Jar file. One plugin per jar. > Another question is because I'm using Google Guava and there exists a > reflection API, so I can iterate over all classes within a package. > IMHO I can use this reflection to load my plugin. Is this a good > choice? Direct reflection is probably too much a reinventing the wheel framework. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
plugin architecture Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus.flashpixx@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 23:29 -0700
Re: plugin architecture Qu0ll <qu0ll64@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 05:10 +1000
Re: plugin architecture Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus.flashpixx@gmail.com> - 2016-07-21 05:17 -0700
Re: plugin architecture Qu0ll <qu0ll64@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 06:18 +1000
Re: plugin architecture Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-07-22 23:50 -0400
Re: plugin architecture Philipp Kraus <philipp.kraus.flashpixx@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:57 -0700
csiph-web