Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #12755
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi, comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Jazelle? |
| Date | 2016-07-20 10:56 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nmo3fd$q3d$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <nmi8on$34p$1@dont-email.me> <nmmged$bm8$2@dont-email.me> <nmn4gf$p1o$2@news.albasani.net> <MPG.31f93e8b429c8383989804@172.16.0.1> <nmnge0$rri$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/20/2016 5:31 AM, gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 wrote: > "Paul" <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> wrote in message > news:MPG.31f93e8b429c8383989804@172.16.0.1... >> In article <nmn4gf$p1o$2@news.albasani.net>, tnp@invalid.invalid says... >>> On 20/07/16 01:25, rickman wrote: >>>> On 7/18/2016 5:50 AM, gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339 wrote: >>>>> I wonder if anyone has done any experiments to determine what the >>>>> Jazelle byte codes are, for use of such things should produce code >>>>> that is even more compact than Thumb? >>>>> >>>>> e.g single steppint code and then examining the changes that have >>>>> been wrought by each code, allowing for some extra bytes as >>>>> addresses or immediate data. >>>> >>>> If you want high code density, you should learn Forth. It can support >>>> a >>>> complete Forth compiler in as little as 16 kB. >>>> >>> Indeed. More compact than assembler really! > > But Forth _IS_ assembler, for it is based on the prior published > art of the KDF9 computer architecture along with its drop, dup, data and > return stacks. Why do you say Forth is based on any particular computer design? Forth emulates an abstract stack based CPU. The KDF9 is one of many which had been designed by the time Forth was invented. -- Rick C
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-18 10:50 +0100
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 20:25 -0400
Re: Jazelle? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-20 07:08 +0100
Re: Jazelle? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-07-20 08:54 +0100
Re: Jazelle? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-20 09:29 +0100
Re: Jazelle? Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2016-07-20 12:56 +0000
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 14:54 +0100
Re: Jazelle? Folderol <general@musically.me.uk> - 2016-07-20 18:40 +0100
Re: Jazelle? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-20 19:12 +0100
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 15:17 -0400
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 20:32 +0100
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 15:37 -0400
CAN / LIN auto bus (was Jazelle?) jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) - 2016-07-20 17:53 -0400
Re: CAN / LIN auto bus (was Jazelle?) Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-20 22:28 +0000
Re: CAN / LIN auto bus (was Jazelle?) druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 23:37 +0100
Re: Jazelle? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-07-20 13:34 +0000
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:26 -0400
Re: Jazelle? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-20 19:51 -0400
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 10:31 +0100
Re: Jazelle? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-20 10:14 +0000
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 14:49 +0100
Re: Jazelle? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-20 14:35 +0000
Re: Jazelle? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-07-20 17:39 +0100
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 20:30 +0100
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 15:35 -0400
Re: Jazelle? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-21 10:43 +0000
Re: Jazelle? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-21 12:44 +0000
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-21 22:59 +0100
Re: Jazelle? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2016-07-22 06:42 +0000
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-22 12:03 +0100
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 09:05 -0400
Re: Jazelle? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-07-22 19:20 +0300
Re: Jazelle? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-25 10:43 +0000
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-26 11:41 +0100
Re: Jazelle? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 06:44 -0400
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 14:52 +0100
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:52 -0400
Re: Jazelle? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-07-20 15:40 +0000
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 11:46 -0400
Re: Jazelle? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2016-07-21 01:27 +0000
Re: Jazelle? "A. Dumas" <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> - 2016-07-21 05:58 +0200
Re: Jazelle? colonel_hack@yahoo.com - 2016-07-21 16:29 -0700
Re: Jazelle? "A. Dumas" <alexandre@dumas.fr.invalid> - 2016-07-22 01:56 +0200
Re: Jazelle? colonel_hack@yahoo.com - 2016-07-22 14:04 -0700
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-22 11:59 +0100
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:56 -0400
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:24 -0400
Re: Jazelle? Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2016-07-20 14:38 +0100
Re: Jazelle? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-20 14:57 +0100
Re: Jazelle? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-20 10:53 -0400
csiph-web