Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #24666
| From | Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: ARM about to be sold |
| Date | 2016-07-19 17:35 +0300 |
| Organization | TGI |
| Message-ID | <nmldqk$iij$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <nmir0j$or$1@dont-email.me> <7uednatZmI31PhDKnZ2dnUU7-LGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <nmkju2$soe$1@dont-email.me> <nmkkgo$utl$1@dont-email.me> <nmldau$go7$1@dont-email.me> |
On 19.7.2016 г. 17:26, rickman wrote:
> On 7/19/2016 3:23 AM, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
>> On 19.7.2016 г. 10:13, rickman wrote:
>>> On 7/18/2016 11:50 PM, Tim Wescott wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:01:40 -0400, rickman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/18/2016 8:15 AM, Simon Clubley wrote:
>>>>>> ARM is about to be sold to a Japanese company:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36822806
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a Brit, it saddens me to see a British success story sold into
>>>>>> foreign hands, but my real concern is about what the future might
>>>>>> bring
>>>>>> several years down the road.
>>>>>
>>>>> I read they expect to double the UK workforce, so not all bad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Questions currently going through my mind include whether ARM will
>>>>>> still be able to perform R&D at their current rate and whether ARM's
>>>>>> engineers will be outsourced in the future and replaced with lower
>>>>>> quality staff.
>>>>>
>>>>> I doubt it. Would you pay billions for a working company and then
>>>>> mess
>>>>> it up? Anyone who can raise billions is not stupid.
>>>>
>>>> History disagrees with you. Sometimes these things work out
>>>> splendidly,
>>>> sometimes they work horribly. Usually the people who make the initial
>>>> deal make out like bandits ('cuz they're not stupid), but often the
>>>> companies involved go down the tubes, leaving stockholders holding an
>>>> empty bag.
>>>
>>> Your logic is very poor. History says things can go bad, but that is no
>>> contradiction to what I said.
>>>
>>
>> Your logic is not very good either though. Anybody who can make billions
>> is not stupid - true.
>> Not being stupid is by far not what it takes to do what ARM did so far
>> though. It takes some extra talent.
>>
>> You don't know whether the guy with the billions has it.
>>
>> I expect things will slowly fall into their places, ARM 32 will stay
>> in small MCU-s (it is just not fit for use in large ones as they use
>> it), ARM 64 may or may not survive, time will tell (I don't know enough
>> about it to make predictions).
>
> 64 bit ARM designs are already rocking the world both in mobile apps and
> desktop.
>
Obviously I know that much, it just is not enough to base a prediction
on it.
I had a brief glance at the architecture 2-3 years ago and it looked OK,
but I did not try to get to the details. At least this one has enough
registers to be able to maintain a full pipeline (as far as I saw).
Dimiter
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ARM about to be sold Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> - 2016-07-18 12:15 +0000
Re: ARM about to be sold rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 11:01 -0400
Re: ARM about to be sold Rob Gaddi <rgaddi@highlandtechnology.invalid> - 2016-07-18 16:44 +0000
Re: ARM about to be sold "tim..." <tims_new_home@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-18 17:53 +0100
Re: ARM about to be sold "Bill Davy" <Bill@SynectixLtd.com> - 2016-07-19 12:06 +0100
Re: ARM about to be sold Mike Perkins <spam@spam.com> - 2016-07-18 19:25 +0100
Re: ARM about to be sold Nils M Holm <nmh@ananda.local> - 2016-07-18 19:10 +0000
Re: ARM about to be sold rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-18 17:58 -0400
Re: ARM about to be sold Tim Wescott <seemywebsite@myfooter.really> - 2016-07-18 22:50 -0500
Re: ARM about to be sold rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 03:13 -0400
Re: ARM about to be sold Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-19 10:23 +0300
Re: ARM about to be sold rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 10:26 -0400
Re: ARM about to be sold Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-19 17:35 +0300
Re: ARM about to be sold Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-07-26 10:57 -0500
Re: ARM about to be sold rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 13:23 -0400
Re: ARM about to be sold Evgeny Filatov <filatov.ev@mipt.ru> - 2016-07-26 20:39 +0300
Re: ARM about to be sold rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 13:49 -0400
Re: ARM about to be sold Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-26 20:51 +0300
Re: ARM about to be sold Evgeny Filatov <filatov.ev@mipt.ru> - 2016-07-26 21:08 +0300
Re: ARM about to be sold Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-26 22:57 +0300
Re: ARM about to be sold Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-26 20:56 +0300
Re: ARM about to be sold Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-07-26 13:45 -0500
Re: ARM about to be sold Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com> - 2016-07-27 03:45 +0300
Re: ARM about to be sold Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-07-27 11:26 -0500
Re: ARM about to be sold lasselangwadtchristensen@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 15:00 -0700
Re: ARM about to be sold Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-07-28 01:46 -0500
Re: ARM about to be sold Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> - 2016-07-28 17:39 +0000
Re: ARM about to be sold rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-07-26 18:13 -0400
Re: ARM about to be sold Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2016-07-26 10:49 -0500
Re: ARM about to be sold Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2016-07-18 08:20 -0700
csiph-web