Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #34934
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Will Math.random return 0.0? |
| Date | 2016-07-17 08:00 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nmfdu6$m6e$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <rand-20160716162126@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <nme2i6$81t$1@dont-email.me> <nme4fm$83g$1@dont-email.me> <nme5l0$9ap$1@dont-email.me> |
On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 20:32:32 +0000, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 16:12:30 -0400, Eric Sosman wrote: > >> On 7/16/2016 3:39 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: >>> [...] >>> Meanwhile, your original code had been running for a while before I >>> developed and played with my extended version and has currently used >>> 100.5 minutes of MPU time, which is close to 1 hour 40 since its using >>> between 99 and 100% of the available CPU time from one of the two >>> cores. This is running on a laptop powered by a 1.6 GHz Core Duo with >>> 3GB of RAM and running Fedora 23 Linux. >>> >>> My billion sample run took 132 seconds to run, or 7.6 million samples >>> were generated and analysed per second. >>> >>> I'll leave your code running to see if it stops any time thus evening. >> >> Back of the envelope: 2^53 possible numerators (maybe), one of >> which is all zero. 7.6 million ~= 2^23 samples per second. Time to >> cycle through all numerators ~= 2^(53-23) ~= 1E9 seconds, which is just >> about thirty-four years. Maybe only half that if we leave out the >> analysis, so you should have a definite conclusion by 2033 or so. >> And maybe you'll only need to get half way through the full cycle to >> hit pay dirt, so I'll pencil you in for, um, 2025. > > Fair enough. Since its 100% use of one core isn't interfering with > anything else this laptop is doing or eating the battery faster than the > charger is filling it, I'll leave it running to see if I get lucky. Killed at 850 m, 14.17 hours. Didn't stop. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Will Math.random return 0.0? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-16 19:39 +0000
Re: Will Math.random return 0.0? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2016-07-16 16:12 -0400
Re: Will Math.random return 0.0? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-16 20:32 +0000
Re: Will Math.random return 0.0? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-17 08:00 +0000
Re: Will Math.random return 0.0? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2016-07-16 16:47 -0400
Re: Will Math.random return 0.0? Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2016-07-17 01:03 +0200
csiph-web