Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #589478
| From | Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. |
| Date | 2016-07-15 22:36 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <nmbohr02mm@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <578818c3$0$51767$b1db1813$15bdbe48@news.astraweb.com> <nm9b2201m1b@news4.newsguy.com> <57894401$0$33654$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com> |
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:13:49 -0400, benj wrote: > > Anyway Chaos is the goal in order to restrict science discussions to > official opinions only. > What do you mean by an "official opinion?" To my knowledge, there is no political hegemony in science similar to, for example, Lysenkism in the former Soviet Union. All ideas are permitted as long as they adhere to the established experimental evidence. > > Best USENET be shut down, > It seems to be already shut down by virtue of the activity of hordes of mal-educated and psychotic armchair speculators. > > it's out of date > All "out of date" arguments are entirely specious. Usenet is still quite viable. It's only drawback is a lack of promotion and a decentralized nature that doesn't mesh with the contemporary preference (i.e. web forums, Facebook, etc.). > > once you start allowing free speech discussions of physics the next > thing you know you have anti-government types posting how LIGO is a > fraud. None of us want to allow that sort of chaos! > What is "speech?" In a scientific context, speech is the articulation of rational and objective arguments that, again, are purely informed by the experimental evidence. In all honesty, can sci.physics be currently considered a bastion of free speech? Please get real. Or please go away and die.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-14 18:57 -0400
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-15 00:34 +0000
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-14 21:07 -0700
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-15 16:13 -0400
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-15 22:36 +0000
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-07-14 23:04 -0700
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-15 12:07 -0700
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-15 16:23 -0400
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-15 22:44 +0000
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-15 21:21 -0700
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-15 21:20 -0700
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-07-16 00:53 -0700
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-07-16 10:12 +0200
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-16 10:39 -0700
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-16 10:38 -0700
Re: Hey Hanson! We need your expertise. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-15 18:15 -0700
csiph-web