Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #588552
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Physics Question |
| Date | 2016-07-10 02:18 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <nlsba7$c6j$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <nllle2$1q3n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nlnj6p$4h7$1@dont-email.me> <nlofhc$lat$2@pcls7.std.com> <nlom99$unc$1@dont-email.me> <11567387.uLZWGnKmhe@PointedEars.de> |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes: >Poutnik wrote: >> On 07/08/2016 05:06 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: >>>> it is releasing energy of excited kernel. >>> >>> Some isotopes have "meta" (excited) states that can give off >>> a gamma to become the ground state. Some of these isomers >>> can also decay radioactively to something else by giving off an >>> alpha or beta. And sometimes the ground state can't decay >>> the same way the isomer can. >> >> Yes, that is correct. >No, the proper description of a nuclear isomer is 'a _metastable_ state of >an atomic nucleus (of an isotope of a chemical element)' ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_isomer> So why are you saying I am wrong? Because I wrote "meta" rather than spelling out "metastable"?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Physics Question Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-07 08:28 -0500
Re: Physics Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 09:02 +0200
Re: Physics Question Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-08 09:19 -0500
Re: Physics Question moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 15:06 +0000
Re: Physics Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 10:11 -0500
Re: Physics Question benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-08 17:12 -0400
Re: Physics Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 16:32 -0500
Re: Physics Question Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 11:15 -0500
Re: Physics Question Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-10 19:25 +0000
Re: Physics Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 15:43 -0500
Re: Physics Question Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-10 21:52 +0000
Re: Physics Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 07:50 -0500
Re: Physics Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 17:04 +0200
Re: Physics Question moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-11 01:20 +0000
Re: Physics Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 19:01 +0200
Re: Physics Question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-09 21:28 +0200
Re: Physics Question moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-10 02:18 +0000
Re: Physics Question Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-09 17:11 +0000
csiph-web