Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #588346
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Physics Question |
| Date | 2016-07-08 10:11 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nlofq5$1hc6$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <nllle2$1q3n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nlnj6p$4h7$1@dont-email.me> <nlofhc$lat$2@pcls7.std.com> |
On 7/8/2016 10:06 AM, Michael Moroney wrote: > Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> writes: > >> Dne 07/07/2016 v 15:28 Sergio napsal(a): >>> 1. A sample of radioactive nuclei of a certain element can decay only by >>> gamma-emission and beta-emission. If the half-life for gamma-emission is >>> 24 minutes and that for beta-emission is 36 minutes, the half-life for >>> the sample is >>> >>> (A) 30 minutes >>> (B) 24 minutes >>> (C) 20.8 minutes >>> (D) 14.4 minutes >>> (E) 6 minutes >>> >> F: Incomplete scenario definition without probabilities. > > The half-lives give the probabilities. Right, and the answer is D, I believe. > >> Aside of that, gamma emission itself is not radioactive decay, >> it is releasing energy of excited kernel. > > Some isotopes have "meta" (excited) states that can give off > a gamma to become the ground state. Some of these isomers > can also decay radioactively to something else by giving off an > alpha or beta. And sometimes the ground state can't decay > the same way the isomer can. > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Physics Question Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-07 08:28 -0500
Re: Physics Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 09:02 +0200
Re: Physics Question Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-08 09:19 -0500
Re: Physics Question moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-08 15:06 +0000
Re: Physics Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 10:11 -0500
Re: Physics Question benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-07-08 17:12 -0400
Re: Physics Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 16:32 -0500
Re: Physics Question Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 11:15 -0500
Re: Physics Question Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-10 19:25 +0000
Re: Physics Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 15:43 -0500
Re: Physics Question Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-10 21:52 +0000
Re: Physics Question Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 07:50 -0500
Re: Physics Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-11 17:04 +0200
Re: Physics Question moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-11 01:20 +0000
Re: Physics Question Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-07-08 19:01 +0200
Re: Physics Question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-07-09 21:28 +0200
Re: Physics Question moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-07-10 02:18 +0000
Re: Physics Question Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-07-09 17:11 +0000
csiph-web