Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #24565
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: 8051-variant dev board recommendations |
| Date | 2016-07-07 08:43 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nlktnf$nd1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <b9e19bb1-964b-9c80-6622-ef37e32d31d5@spth.de> <MPG.31e77c08a74ef90d98970b@news.eternal-september.org> |
On 07/07/16 06:35, Michael Karas wrote: > [This followup was posted to comp.arch.embedded and a copy was sent to > the cited author.] > > In article <b9e19bb1-964b-9c80-6622-ef37e32d31d5@spth.de>, pkk@spth.de > says... >> >> I'm looking for dev / eval boards for 8051-variants. Can anyone >> recommend good/cheap boards that fit the following criteria: >> * Enough XRAM. I'd need at least 2KB, but 5KB would be better. >> * There should be free tools to get the program onto the MCU. >> >> Ideally, I'd like to have boards for these 8051-variants: >> * Intel 8052-like >> * AMD 80C521-style dual dptr (DPL1 at 0x84, DPH1 at 0x85, DPS at 0x86.0) >> * Philips P89C51R-style dual dptr (DPS at 0xa2.0) >> >> Maybe also: >> * Siemens SAB 80C517-like (8 dptr, DPSEL at 0x92, MDU) >> * Infineon XC888-like (2 dptr, EO at 0xd0, MDU, Cordic) >> * Other 8051-variants (multi-dptr styles, possible MDU) >> >> Philipp > > If I were you I would give up on all those ancient variants (a good > share are already history and many of the others follow soon) and focus > on one decent family. SiLabs makes a plethora of variants that have > superior on-chip debug support and work as true small architecture SOC > type devices. One I have used many times is the C8051F340 part that has > on-board 64K byte code flash and 4K bytes of on-chip XRAM. You can buy > small development boards off eBay with this processor for in the 25-30$ > range. > I don't think Philipp is looking for these boards because he actually /wants/ to use the ancient 8051 devices. As a general point, few people ever choose an 8051 core if they have a choice - they pick a device for the peripherals and are stuck with the core that comes with it. But Philipp is heavily involved in the SDCC compiler - he will be looking for these devices to test the compiler on them.
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
8051-variant dev board recommendations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-07-07 01:26 +0200
Re: 8051-variant dev board recommendations Michael Karas <mkaras@carousel-design.com> - 2016-07-06 21:35 -0700
Re: 8051-variant dev board recommendations David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-07 08:43 +0200
Re: 8051-variant dev board recommendations Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2016-07-10 18:50 +0200
Re: 8051-variant dev board recommendations Martin Riddle <martin_ridd@verizon.net> - 2016-07-07 19:34 -0400
csiph-web