Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: OT: Evolution disproven |
| Date | 2016-07-07 04:38 +0100 |
| Organization | Origin Sonata |
| Message-ID | <nlkira$uco$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <457b8593-8a0e-43b9-b9e3-7385d192dfb9@googlegroups.com> <nlbq8a$7oe$2@dont-email.me> <nlbqcp$7oe$3@dont-email.me> <nljrq0$tr0$2@dont-email.me> <du5ua1FgmuiU2@mid.individual.net> |
On 07/07/16 03:49, Ian Collins wrote: > On 07/ 7/16 09:04 AM, Ken Brody wrote: >> On 7/3/2016 3:51 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> On 7/3/2016 12:49 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>> On 7/3/2016 6:13 AM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote: >>>> [...] >>>>> It's a ploy to trick those who will only look at the surface, and who >>>>> won't pursue the truth with a real, full effort. >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> If one digs below the surface to find the truth, one will find that the >>>> earth is more than 5000 years old. >>>> >>> >>> BTW, why the hell do you get to limit God with 5000 years? Are you >>> kidding >>> me? IMVVVHO, God is a hyper smart scientist, and knows how to deal with >>> infinity. Why do you limit this God? Are you a moron? >> [...] >> >> Perhaps this particular universe is 6000 years old, but $DIETY created >> (and >> perhaps destroyed) countless universes before this one? >> >> :-) > > Or maybe $DIETY's $DIETY created (and perhaps destroyed) countless > $DIETYs before this one? > > Sorry, couldn't resist... (a) Didn't any of you do Latin at school? It's DEITY, not DIETY. (b) What in heaven or on earth does this have to do with C? (c) I have implemented genetic algorithms using the C language, and I can testify that evolution works just fine - I have used it to find good-enough solutions to problems that are too unwieldy for an exhaustive search. Thus, the claim (in the Subject header of this thread) that evolution is disproven is patently false. There is a perfectly reasonable way to reconcile the scientific model with a Biblically young Earth that doesn't require anyone to mock anyone else's point of view or suspend their disbelief or anything like that. If anyone wants to know what it is, by all means ask - but in a newsgroup that is intended for that purpose. Sure as eggs is eggs, that newsgroup is not *this* newsgroup. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 09:26 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2016-07-01 09:46 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-01 10:02 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-07-01 20:06 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-01 12:33 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 10:06 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 12:36 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 12:43 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 13:09 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 14:34 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2016-07-01 15:48 -0400
Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-04 00:11 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-03 23:15 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2016-07-04 09:31 +0800
Re: OT: Evolution disproven gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-04 04:50 +0000
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 15:39 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 23:54 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-04 19:20 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 07:00 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 07:32 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-05 15:39 +0000
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-05 09:11 -0700
See sig (Was: OT: Evolution disproven) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-05 17:48 +0000
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-06 17:53 -0400
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-06 18:44 -0700
What is a troll? (Was: OT: Evolution disproven) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-05 15:43 +0000
Re: OT: Evolution disproven supercat@casperkitty.com - 2016-07-01 10:43 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 10:54 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:01 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-07-01 20:04 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:08 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-07-01 20:13 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:36 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-07-01 21:05 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 12:38 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2016-07-01 11:44 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 21:49 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 19:09 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 19:20 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2016-07-02 02:34 +0800
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 19:03 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:36 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 11:40 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-01 13:58 -0500
Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-02 23:44 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-07-02 16:07 -0600
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-02 17:12 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 17:24 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-02 18:56 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 19:12 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-06 17:00 -0400
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-06 14:15 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-01 21:30 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2016-07-01 19:30 -0400
Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-02 00:25 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 15:36 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 01:27 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 02:58 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 12:16 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 06:13 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 17:53 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 10:21 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 12:49 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 12:51 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 13:04 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 13:20 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-06 17:04 -0400
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-06 19:08 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-06 19:30 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-07 08:55 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-11 17:56 -0400
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-07 14:49 +1200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-07 04:38 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-07 09:19 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 00:50 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2016-07-07 19:27 +1200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-11 19:05 -0400
Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-10 18:14 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-07-10 17:42 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-10 12:06 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 12:16 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-11 17:57 -0400
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 12:58 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-03 13:15 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-03 13:21 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2016-07-03 23:59 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-04 00:10 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-01 15:36 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2016-07-02 08:54 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2016-07-06 16:45 -0400
Re: OT: Evolution disproven Real Troll <real.troll@trolls.com> - 2016-07-06 22:06 +0100
Re: OT: Evolution disproven gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2016-07-06 22:09 +0000
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 05:43 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-07-07 16:18 +0200
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-07-07 07:22 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 16:11 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-05 16:42 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-11-05 17:45 -0700
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 02:03 -0800
Re: OT: Evolution disproven "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 03:40 -0800
csiph-web