Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.basics > #48561

Re: Schematics nomenclature

From N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.basics, sci.electronics.components, sci.electronics.design, sci.electronics.repair, alt.engineering.electrical
Subject Re: Schematics nomenclature
Date 2016-07-04 18:49 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nle7ik$m7s$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <0001HW.1D2AB7C20024562F1098D53CF@news.eternal-september.org> <nle42f$8nn$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 04/07/2016 17:49, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
> DaveC wrote:
>> http://imgur.com/KWFIN1H
>>
>> Pins 12 and 13 have a little triangle next to the pin; pins 1, 2, 15,
>> 16 have what looks like an "n"; 3 and 14 have an "x".
>>
>> What's the meaning of these marks?
>
> That's the IEEE standard schematic notation touted by TI in the 80's.
> The downward sloping triangle means logical inversion, or active-low.  I
> don't remember the others.
>
>

In that case "x" means don't care

Back to sci.electronics.basics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Schematics nomenclature DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2016-07-04 08:26 -0700
  Re: Schematics nomenclature "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> - 2016-07-04 12:49 -0400
    Re: Schematics nomenclature N_Cook <diverse@tcp.co.uk> - 2016-07-04 18:49 +0100
  Re: Schematics nomenclature Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-07-04 21:11 +0300
  Re: Schematics nomenclature Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2016-07-04 11:22 -0700
    Re: Schematics nomenclature DaveC <not@home.cow> - 2016-07-04 12:45 -0700

csiph-web