Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #94956
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: GCC vs. LLVM |
| Date | 2026-11-02 23:16 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nksgegF3cbdU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <NrWcnStRk_8FYHv3nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <11c73ip$1s4us$1@kst.eternal-september.org> <2oWdnWWut6BKWXr3nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <11c93bv$2ibdp$1@kst.eternal-september.org> <DbqcnUXBFt-yrnX3nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
On 2026-11-02 07:52, c186282 wrote:
> On 11/1/26 23:25, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> (Why do you indent your original text in your posts? I find it
>> distracting.)
>
> That's "MY STYLE". Live with it. Keeps it more plain what others
> say, what I say. Also like 'random' capitalization and odd
> punctuation to kind-of emulate 'natural speaking'. You do it your
> way, I'll do it mine, and we'll all get there together.
Done. :-)
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 03:11 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-10-31 17:28 +1000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 13:25 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-10-31 10:30 -0400
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-31 15:12 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-31 19:21 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-10-31 21:06 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-01 00:39 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-11-01 01:45 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-01 09:05 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-01 03:51 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-11-01 02:16 -0800
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-01 18:01 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-11-01 20:25 -0800
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 01:52 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-11-01 23:06 -0800
Re: GCC vs. LLVM The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-02 10:39 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 11:37 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-11-02 16:54 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 11:57 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-11-04 03:58 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-11-02 23:16 +0100
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 20:47 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-11-02 23:01 +0000
Re: GCC vs. LLVM c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-11-02 21:03 -0500
Re: GCC vs. LLVM Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-11-03 02:44 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-11-01 10:07 -0500
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-01 18:31 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-11-02 11:54 -0500
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-11-02 14:18 -0500
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-11-02 20:17 +0000
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-11-03 08:22 -0500
Re: Substantive Comments Please: GCC vs. LLMV Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-11-03 18:44 +0000
csiph-web