Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #586624

Re: Pentcho Valev

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Pentcho Valev
Date 2016-06-25 12:58 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nkmgnt$1c6l$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <dt3g1cFk3ntU1@mid.individual.net> <607684c7-77ab-48f1-bcaf-8d022ac1f17d@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/24/2016 7:50 PM, Louis Savain wrote:
> On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 6:17:37 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
>> Does he ever reply to a post other than his own?
>>
>> He obviously spends a lot of time constructing his missives. I just
>> wonder at his motivation.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Valev is doing the world a service. Science should be challenged and falsified, not
> corroborated. Otherwise, it becomes a religion. Question science always.
>

Opposition for the sake of opposition is not particularly constructive.
Consider that any theory is tested by corroboration by experimental 
results. If every corroborative experimental result were thrown out as 
"unscientific" or "religious", then no theory would EVER pass 
experimental test. Likewise, experimental results are usually required 
to be confirmed by an independent research team before they are 
unilaterally accepted by the scientific community. (This is why there 
are both CMS and ATLAS experiments at LHC, for example.) If such 
corroboration were somehow "religious" or "unscientific", then no 
experimental result would be accepted, and then theories would become 
untestable.

So I think you carry the Viva La Oposicion flag a little too high.


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Pentcho Valev Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-24 11:17 +1000
  Re: Pentcho Valev jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-24 02:04 +0000
  Re: Pentcho Valev Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 07:34 -0500
  Re: Pentcho Valev "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2016-06-24 19:39 +0200
  Re: Pentcho Valev "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 17:33 -0700
  Re: Pentcho Valev Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 17:50 -0700
    Re: Pentcho Valev jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 05:11 +0000
      Re: Pentcho Valev Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 00:30 -0700
        Re: Pentcho Valev jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 15:40 +0000
          Re: Pentcho Valev Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 10:05 -0700
            Re: Pentcho Valev jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 20:22 +0000
              Re: Pentcho Valev Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 13:32 -0700
    Re: Pentcho Valev Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 12:58 -0500
  Re: Pentcho Valev "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 19:54 -0700

csiph-web