Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #586624
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Pentcho Valev |
| Date | 2016-06-25 12:58 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nkmgnt$1c6l$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <dt3g1cFk3ntU1@mid.individual.net> <607684c7-77ab-48f1-bcaf-8d022ac1f17d@googlegroups.com> |
On 6/24/2016 7:50 PM, Louis Savain wrote: > On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 6:17:37 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >> Does he ever reply to a post other than his own? >> >> He obviously spends a lot of time constructing his missives. I just >> wonder at his motivation. >> >> Sylvia. > > Valev is doing the world a service. Science should be challenged and falsified, not > corroborated. Otherwise, it becomes a religion. Question science always. > Opposition for the sake of opposition is not particularly constructive. Consider that any theory is tested by corroboration by experimental results. If every corroborative experimental result were thrown out as "unscientific" or "religious", then no theory would EVER pass experimental test. Likewise, experimental results are usually required to be confirmed by an independent research team before they are unilaterally accepted by the scientific community. (This is why there are both CMS and ATLAS experiments at LHC, for example.) If such corroboration were somehow "religious" or "unscientific", then no experimental result would be accepted, and then theories would become untestable. So I think you carry the Viva La Oposicion flag a little too high. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pentcho Valev Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-06-24 11:17 +1000
Re: Pentcho Valev jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-24 02:04 +0000
Re: Pentcho Valev Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 07:34 -0500
Re: Pentcho Valev "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2016-06-24 19:39 +0200
Re: Pentcho Valev "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 17:33 -0700
Re: Pentcho Valev Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-24 17:50 -0700
Re: Pentcho Valev jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 05:11 +0000
Re: Pentcho Valev Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 00:30 -0700
Re: Pentcho Valev jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 15:40 +0000
Re: Pentcho Valev Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 10:05 -0700
Re: Pentcho Valev jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-06-25 20:22 +0000
Re: Pentcho Valev Louis Savain <mapou001@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 13:32 -0700
Re: Pentcho Valev Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-06-25 12:58 -0500
Re: Pentcho Valev "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-06-23 19:54 -0700
csiph-web