Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.vms |
| Subject | Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities |
| Date | 2016-06-23 12:57 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nkh4cs$e44$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <12dc01db-a048-41d7-916b-77b2942ef941@googlegroups.com> <nket1q$mi4$1@dont-email.me> <dnbr3d-3ll.ln1@news.chingola.ch> <nkf9es$14m$4@dont-email.me> <cGsWD1xkaIsF@eisner.encompasserve.org> |
Bob Koehler wrote: > In article <nkf9es$14m$4@dont-email.me>, David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> writes: >> I don't think the default privs ever go away. Could be wrong. Too lazy to check. > > You can turn them off, so that your current process doesn't have them. > But when you try to turn them back on, the UAF will be consulted to see > if you're allowed to have them, not just your current process > privileges. So you don't need SETPRV to get back something you're > authorized to have. > Yeah, and the terminology is "authorized", not "default". I just tried to turn them off, and they are still listed. Not sure if they are set in the process tables, or just pulled from SYSUAF. Back to "too lazy" ..
Back to comp.os.vms | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-06-15 00:54 -0700
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> - 2016-06-16 20:53 +0000
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-06-16 16:02 -0700
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-06-16 16:03 -0700
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2016-06-16 20:06 -0400
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities "Kerry Main" <kemain.nospam@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 20:57 -0400
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities RobertsonEricW <robertsonericw@netzero.net> - 2016-06-21 05:29 -0700
SEVMS, was: Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> - 2016-06-21 13:02 +0000
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2016-06-21 11:20 -0400
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Jerry Eckert <jerry.eckert@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 11:41 -0500
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-06-21 22:59 -0700
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-06-21 22:57 -0700
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2016-06-22 09:38 -0400
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities mcleanjoh@gmail.com - 2016-06-22 01:09 -0700
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2016-06-22 09:47 -0400
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-22 16:39 -0400
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2016-06-22 23:14 +0200
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities abrsvc <dansabrservices@yahoo.com> - 2016-06-22 14:41 -0700
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-06-22 19:03 -0700
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2016-06-22 17:48 -0400
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities Chris Scheers <chris@applied-synergy.com> - 2016-06-22 19:57 -0500
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-22 20:11 -0400
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities koehler@eisner.nospam.decuserve.org (Bob Koehler) - 2016-06-23 09:19 -0400
Re: VMS Privileges Versus Linux Capabilities David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-23 12:57 -0400
csiph-web