Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin.

From	moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin.
Date	2016-06-17 03:55 +0000
Organization	The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID	<njvsb3$2if$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References	<a0d01cec-59f3-4ffd-ac3f-6a80a1521e31@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Geez, all you are doing is hijacking a term used by astronomers and
assigning it to a completely unrelated figment of your imagination.
In their simplest form, black holes don't even involve rotation, although
if they do rotate they have additional properties.  You do the same thing
with the word "neutrino" and with some other phrases, the things you call
neutrinos have nothing to do with what particle physicists call neutrinos.

Why not make up your own names for your imaginary things?

Thread

BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 14:14 -0700
  Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 16:00 -0700
  Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin. "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 23:41 -0700
    Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 04:04 -0700
      Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 12:38 -0700
  Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-17 03:55 +0000
    Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-06-16 23:43 -0700
      Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-17 11:03 +0000
        Re: BHs trap light not by gravity, but by spin. ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-06-17 10:47 -0500

csiph-web