Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #164380

Re: The football supporters' derisory chant?

From sidd@situ.com (sidd)
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: The football supporters' derisory chant?
Date 2016-06-03 00:09 -0400
Organization Little
Message-ID <niqvtk$fq1$1@Lazarus.situ.com> (permalink)
References <nieg7j$k84$1@dont-email.me> <nies27$q53$1@dont-email.me> <1aa232de-809b-45a8-a182-5b7e785d01ef@googlegroups.com> <MPG.31b66610b06680dc98a1e6@news.eternal-september.org>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <MPG.31b66610b06680dc98a1e6@news.eternal-september.org>,
J. Clarke <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> wrote:

>I have been wondering for a while about the wisdom of including new 
>"structured" branching when the language already has branching 
>constructs.

surely JNZ is all we need ?

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The football supporters' derisory chant? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-05-29 11:31 +0100
  Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-05-29 10:44 +0000
    Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-05-29 14:25 +0100
      Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-05-29 13:27 +0000
        Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-05-29 14:53 +0100
          Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-05-29 15:51 +0000
            Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-05-29 17:37 +0100
              Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-05-29 17:35 +0000
            Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-05-29 18:35 +0100
              Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-05-29 18:11 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-06-04 22:10 -0500
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-05 07:22 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-05 09:13 +0100
              Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-05-29 20:34 +0200
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? mausg@mail.com - 2016-05-30 14:47 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 13:32 -0400
              Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? usenet@only.tnx (Questor) - 2016-05-31 17:33 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2016-05-31 14:51 -0400
              Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-05-31 20:32 +0000
          Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-05-30 11:36 -0700
            Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-05-30 19:51 +0000
              Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-05-30 22:57 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-31 07:06 +0100
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2016-05-31 07:13 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-31 09:02 +0100
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-05-31 08:37 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-05-31 12:25 +0100
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-31 14:06 +0100
            Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 16:01 -0400
              Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-05-31 07:44 +0100
              Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? sidd@situ.com (sidd) - 2016-06-03 00:09 -0400
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-03 10:34 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-03 13:16 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-06-03 14:47 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-04 13:45 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-06-03 17:36 +0000
                Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-06-04 13:44 +0000
            Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-05-30 23:21 +0100
        Re: The football supporters' derisory chant? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-29 11:50 -0400

csiph-web