Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.unix.geeks > #687
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.unix.geeks, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System |
| Date | 2026-10-04 03:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nie0tjFoo9pU10@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <U-6cnfAZmrg_3iL3nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <119obrj$24uqg$1@dont-email.me> <cR-dna9thaWhBV33nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <nid5u7Foo9pU8@mid.individual.net> <119s6a8$3fkuv$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sat, 3 Oct 2026 17:23:34 -0700, Lars Poulsen wrote: > Now that both my wife and I have our iPhones on T-Mobile, I wonder what > is the best cheap virtual carrier that does NOT use T-Mobile airwaves? > I like to have a spare Android phone to use when the main system is > down. Although AT&T has the best coverage in town, we left them because > of poor customer service, and independent of that, a couple of years > ago, their network in our part of town was down for THREE DAYS. I had TracFone for years but switched to Mint when I went to 4G. Since then Verizon has bought TracFone. Verizon seems to have a number of virtual plans but the cheapest I see is $20/mo. Mint is $15/mo with 6 GB of data. Not a huge difference. Back when I went with Mint Verizon didn't have any similar plans. Today I'd probably go with one of theirs since coverage is a little better here. I'm not sure why Verizon and T-Mobile bought the virtual carriers and kept the plans rather than offering a similar deal to start with.
Back to alt.unix.geeks | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-10-02 06:33 -0700
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 15:12 +0100
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 01:52 -0400
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 20:12 +0000
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-10-03 17:23 -0700
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-04 03:53 +0000
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 00:04 -0400
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-04 04:19 +0000
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-10-04 13:46 -0700
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 03:36 -0400
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 23:47 -0400
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-04 04:34 +0000
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 02:14 -0400
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-04 19:06 +0000
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 01:35 +0100
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 02:01 +0000
Re: Micro-Review "ATT Home-Advanced" System The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 09:47 +0100
csiph-web