Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #352727
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Linux Technology |
| Date | 2016-04-29 22:51 +0200 |
| Organization | DNLA GmbH |
| Message-ID | <ng0h9f$9mj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <nft9gn$172$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <nftudr$jh4$1@dont-email.me> <D347E39A.7149E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <nfv2bi$ms3$1@dont-email.me> <D348EA9E.715E6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Snit wrote: > On 4/29/16, 12:30 AM, in article nfv2bi$ms3$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser snotted: >> >>> On 4/28/16, 2:16 PM, in article nftudr$jh4$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Are you really certain that you want to claim that? >>>>>> OSX is by far the slowest OS of the 3 linux, windows and OSX. >>>>>> Especially with its prehistoric filesystem HFS, which is as slow as a >>>>>> snail on tranquilizers >>>>>> Windows is not that much faster, though. >>>>>> And both windows and OSX get trounced by linux file access times >>>>> >>>>> That old chestnut again? Seriously, I doubt in a blind test in >>>>> accessing the same file from any of those filesystems you'd be able to >>>>> tell the difference. So long as your pictures of lederhosen are >>>>> delivered, a difference of a few milliseconds is going to be >>>>> completely unnoticed. >>>> >>>> Those "few miliseconds" tend to add up quite fast. >>>> There is a reason OSX is so incredibly slow, and it is not the >>>> hardware. The OS is crap, and its filesystem belongs in the garbage >>>> bin, not on computers. >>> >>> There may be some truth to that (though you will never support it) but I >>> think the bigger issue is Apple ships their iMacs and minis with 5400 >>> RPM drives! That is insane! >> >> >> Idiot. I have a SSD in my Mac. Does it help? Certainly. Is it faster than >> with a HD? Naturally. >> >> Is it anywhere the same speed as a linux box with a HD? Not nearly so. >> The linux box with a HD is *faster* on file access than the Mac with a >> SSD. Granted, this is a fast HD, not a crappy one like apple plugs into >> their box >> >> And I run a linux box with the same model SSD, similar processor speed. >> The Mac gets *trounced* in file access times. The linux box is doing the >> compile of a *very* large project (more than 200.000 lines of source >> code) *3 times* as fast as the comparable Mac. The same is true when I >> boot linux on the Mac (I have it dualbooting). Linux runs circles around >> that shitty OSX > > I look forward to seeing your evidence. I look forward to you kissing asses, lying imbecile
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux Technology vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 02:35 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:47 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-28 04:56 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-28 05:12 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:43 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-28 09:59 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-28 09:33 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 04:15 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-28 13:50 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-28 16:20 +0100
Shut up rodent, Tricks are for Kids, NOT rabbits John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 12:31 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-28 23:16 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 15:58 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 09:30 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-29 10:24 +0100
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 13:25 +0200
Re: Linux Technology GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-29 17:06 -0600
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 02:14 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 02:28 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 02:58 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 03:15 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 03:37 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 04:00 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 04:39 +0200
Re: Linux Technology meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-30 13:29 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 15:51 +0200
Re: Linux Technology meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-30 14:10 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-30 09:47 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-29 18:34 -0700
Re: Linux Technology GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-30 17:21 -0600
Re: Linux Technology GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-30 17:23 -0600
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-30 19:33 -0700
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 09:20 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 15:44 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-29 08:32 -0700
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 12:07 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 09:13 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 18:50 +0200
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 13:41 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 18:24 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-29 22:09 +0000
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 18:58 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-29 23:26 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-29 10:40 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 22:51 +0200
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-01 16:11 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 00:07 +0200
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-18 17:01 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-18 23:30 +0200
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-28 10:10 -0400
Re: Linux Technology JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-06-01 22:00 -0500
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-06-02 00:02 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-06-01 21:28 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-28 05:07 +0200
Re: Linux Technology vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 03:33 +0000
Re: Linux Technology vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 03:13 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:42 -0700
Re: Linux Technology John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 02:42 -0700
Re: Linux Technology John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 02:43 -0700
csiph-web