Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #352383
| From | Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Linux Technology |
| Date | 2016-04-28 09:33 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <nfslcv02olv@news1.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <dodb7oF9pplU2@mid.individual.net> <D346C7EC.712CE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <20160428045611.49ea1294@maxa-pc> |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:56:11 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > > On OSX one can refer file by inode (.vol filesystem), though, which is > much more powerful. > Does this imbecile imply that ASSX is better in this regard? On Linux, a file cannot be accessed through its inode because that would be a major security risk. On Linux, to open a file, the kernel traverses the entire directory tree to get the file name and this allows a determination of the directory permissions. Using the inode to open the file would not do this. Therefore, the Linux behavior is far better.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux Technology vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 02:35 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 19:47 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-28 04:56 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-28 05:12 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:43 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-28 09:59 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-28 09:33 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 04:15 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-28 13:50 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-28 16:20 +0100
Shut up rodent, Tricks are for Kids, NOT rabbits John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 12:31 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-28 23:16 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-28 15:58 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 09:30 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-29 10:24 +0100
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 13:25 +0200
Re: Linux Technology GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-29 17:06 -0600
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 02:14 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 02:28 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 02:58 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 03:15 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 03:37 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 04:00 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 04:39 +0200
Re: Linux Technology meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-30 13:29 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 15:51 +0200
Re: Linux Technology meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-30 14:10 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-30 09:47 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-29 18:34 -0700
Re: Linux Technology GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-30 17:21 -0600
Re: Linux Technology GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-04-30 17:23 -0600
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-30 19:33 -0700
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 09:20 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 15:44 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-29 08:32 -0700
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 12:07 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 09:13 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 18:50 +0200
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 13:41 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 18:24 +0200
Re: Linux Technology Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-29 22:09 +0000
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 18:58 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-29 23:26 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-29 10:40 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-29 22:51 +0200
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-01 16:11 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 00:07 +0200
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-18 17:01 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-18 23:30 +0200
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-28 10:10 -0400
Re: Linux Technology JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-06-01 22:00 -0500
Re: Linux Technology DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-06-02 00:02 -0400
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-06-01 21:28 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 10:29 -0700
Re: Linux Technology Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-28 05:07 +0200
Re: Linux Technology vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 03:33 +0000
Re: Linux Technology vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-28 03:13 +0000
Re: Linux Technology Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-27 20:42 -0700
Re: Linux Technology John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 02:42 -0700
Re: Linux Technology John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 02:43 -0700
csiph-web