Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #382201
| From | Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation |
| Date | 2016-04-24 13:28 +0200 |
| Organization | @somewhere |
| Message-ID | <nfial4$1an$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <6b22d49e-ad50-4437-98c1-764391760126@googlegroups.com> <nfi55g$1p76$1@gioia.aioe.org> <do3m87F1349U1@mid.individual.net> |
Op 24-apr-2016 om 12:42 schreef Sylvia Else: > On 24/04/2016 7:54 PM, Dirk Van de moortel wrote: >> Op 24-apr-2016 om 11:00 schreef Thomas: >>> I. INTRODUCTION >>> >>> The invariance of the speed of light in different reference frames >>> lies at the heart of the derivation of the Lorentz transformation and >>> thus the theory of Special Relativity. The derivation typically >>> assumes two given events associated with the propagation of a light >>> signal, and then looks for a linear transformation of the space and >>> time coordinates of these events that would also correspond to the >>> same speed of light c in a different reference frame moving with a >>> velocity v relatively to the first. In the following it is shown that >>> such a transformation can not exist without violating the speed of >>> light postulate applied to an independent measurement of the speed of >>> light in the second reference frame. >>> >>> >>> II. PROOF >> >> See also: >> http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ReviewPaper.html >> http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Inconsistent.html >> http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/MScPhD.html >> That's 11 years. >> >> Dirk Vdm > > Oh, so he's one of those. Should have guessed. > > Sylvia. Just a few days ago I was wondering when there would be another idiot coming here with a bunch of simple equations "Proving Einstein Wrong", only because they miserably fail to understand the meanings of the variables. There was a time when we had a full time job debunking them here. And Somehow it seemed they had all left. Or died. But it looks like Smith is still somewhat alive. Dirk Vdm
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 02:00 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-24 19:13 +1000
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 05:08 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-25 12:58 +1000
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-04-24 11:54 +0200
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-24 20:42 +1000
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-04-24 13:28 +0200
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-24 11:48 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-25 07:23 +1000
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-24 09:48 -0500
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 08:18 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-24 18:50 -0500
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 13:40 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-25 13:45 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 16:35 -0500
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 10:34 -0700
Imbecile Thomas Smid perseveres "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-26 11:31 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-25 17:55 -0400
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 10:30 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 16:18 +0200
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 13:39 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 15:55 -0500
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:38 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 10:15 -0500
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 13:13 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 15:46 -0500
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 14:25 -0700
Cretin Thomas Smid persists "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-05-02 14:27 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 07:37 +0200
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 09:36 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-28 09:48 -0700
Imbecile Thomas Smid perseveres "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-27 22:51 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-05-03 01:48 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Larry Harson <johnmcandrew66@gmail.com> - 2016-04-24 12:52 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2016-04-24 22:39 +0200
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-24 18:45 -0500
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 13:32 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-25 13:46 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 13:59 -0700
Thomas Smid, autistic imbecile "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-25 14:44 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 15:45 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-05-03 17:52 -0500
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 14:35 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-05-09 17:07 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 23:06 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato <rvalls162@gmail.com> - 2016-05-05 09:50 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-24 11:49 -0700
The collected imbecilities of Thomas Smid "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-24 11:51 -0700
Re: The collected imbecilities of Thomas Smid "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-24 11:55 -0700
Re: The collected imbecilities of Thomas Smid Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-27 10:32 -0500
Re: The collected imbecilities of Thomas Smid "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-27 09:28 -0700
Exposing Thomas Smid's imbecilities "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-27 07:49 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation alsor@interia.pl - 2016-04-27 12:34 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Larry Harson <johnmcandrew66@gmail.com> - 2016-04-27 17:16 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:40 -0700
Cretin Thomas Smid perseveres "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-05-01 17:38 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Larry Harson <johnmcandrew66@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 08:53 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Thomas <thomas.smid@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 13:40 -0700
Imbecile Thomas Smid perseveres "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-05-04 13:42 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Larry Harson <johnmcandrew66@gmail.com> - 2016-05-04 14:59 -0700
Cretin Thomas Smid is proven wrong "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-28 08:57 -0700
Cretin Thomas Smid proven wrong "Dono," <sa_ge@comcast.net> - 2016-04-28 09:17 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Carl Susumu <numbernumber1212@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 16:51 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Carl Susumu <numbernumber1212@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 16:56 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-05-02 18:20 -0700
Re: The Light Speed Postulate and its Interpretation in Derivations of the Lorentz Transformation Carl Susumu <numbernumber1212@gmail.com> - 2016-05-09 17:16 -0700
csiph-web