Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #3713
| From | Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: networking and fragments |
| Date | 2016-04-23 12:05 +0200 |
| Organization | Plouf ! |
| Message-ID | <nffhdd$750$1@saria.nerim.net> (permalink) |
| References | <nehfiq$d6t$2@reader1.panix.com> |
Popping mad a écrit : > > "Fragments need to be reassembled before they reach the transport layer at > the destination. Indeed, both TCP and UDP are expecting to receive > complete, unfragmented segments from the network layer." > > I thought that was wrong. You are right : UDP uses datagrams, not segments. > They have to be reassembled AT the destination, not before that. > > Where am I confused, or is this in fact incorrect? IPv4 does not preclude reassembly before the destination. IPv6 does (as it precludes fragmentation after the sender).
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
networking and fragments Popping mad <rainbow@colition.gov> - 2016-04-12 00:30 +0000
Re: networking and fragments William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2016-04-12 03:16 +0000
Re: networking and fragments Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2016-04-23 12:05 +0200
Re: networking and fragments Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2016-04-24 12:53 +0000
csiph-web