Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #284270

Re: unlock a phone

From "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy
Subject Re: unlock a phone
Date 2016-04-22 10:02 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nfdee8$18je$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <56DA0ECA.66F7@ix.netcom.com> <56E457FA.6350@ix.netcom.com> <56E86514.2DAB@ix.netcom.com> <5719664A.30BC@ix.netcom.com> <4e3khbl5p0ov9t5srgmml89888ep6kk7v7@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


SOLLY'S PHONE STILL HAS A DIAL.

Notroll2016

"Saul Levy"  wrote in message 
news:4e3khbl5p0ov9t5srgmml89888ep6kk7v7@4ax.com...

FAKERSHIT:  TAXES!

YOU REALLY ARE STUPID!

Saul Levy


On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:46:18 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >
>> > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Even if the Justice Department loses its legal showdown with 
>> > > > > > Apple Inc.
>> > > > > > over access to a killer’s iPhone, the government might still be 
>> > > > > > able to
>> > > > > > extract the data locked away inside it, computer-security 
>> > > > > > experts say.
>> > > > > > But it would be risky, expensive and time-consuming.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Those experts say officials could try to physically crack open 
>> > > > > > the A6
>> > > > > > microprocessor inside the phone of Syed Rizwan Farook, 
>> > > > > > targeting the
>> > > > > > portion of the chip that holds the user ID, or UID, key. With 
>> > > > > > the key,
>> > > > > > officials could move the iPhone’s scrambled data to another 
>> > > > > > computer and
>> > > > > > quickly unlock it.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If agents were able to obtain it by probing the chip, however, 
>> > > > > they
>> > > > > would then only need to guess Mr. Farook’s passcode, free of the
>> > > > > limitations that have so far prevented them from accessing the 
>> > > > > phone.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The most likely method to extract the key, the experts said, 
>> > > > > would be by
>> > > > > using a focused ion beam—essentially a very precise atomic saw 
>> > > > > that can
>> > > > > cut through the chip’s outer structures to expose the 1s and 0s 
>> > > > > stored
>> > > > > in the chip.
>> > > >
>> > > > http://www.wsj.com/articles/chip-hacking-might-help-fbi-unlock-iphones-1457050959
>> > > >
>> > > > work the problem.
>> > >
>> > > of course, this is just an old old hack, like making a copy of the 
>> > > file and crack it on your own time.
>> >
>> > if you can get a monkey to type the whole collection of Shakespeare...a
>> > monkey can unlock an iPhone in his garage.
>> >
>> > All the FBI has to do is buy a garage..
>>
>> http://fortune.com/2016/03/15/google-doubled-reward-hack-chromebook/
>>
>> I guess the FBI won't be trying it...
>
>
>FBI Paid More Than $1M to Hack San Bernardino iPhone
>http://www.wsj.com/articles/comey-fbi-paid-more-than-1-million-to-hack-san-bernardino-iphone-1461266641
>
>
>what does FBI stand for? Forever Bothering IPhones.
>
>
>where does the fbi get a million dollars from? 

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 09:18 -0800
  Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-26 22:08 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 10:58 -0800
      Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 14:25 +1100
        Re: unloock a phone benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 22:32 -0500
          Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-03-01 22:00 +1100
        Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:27 -0800
          Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:28 -0800
            Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 11:29 -0800
              Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-04 14:40 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-12 09:55 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-15 11:40 -0800
                Re: unlock a phone The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-21 16:46 -0700
                Re: unlock a phone Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-04-22 04:41 -0700
                Re: unlock a phone "Notroll2016" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2016-04-22 10:02 -0500
                Re: unlock a phone Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-04-22 09:00 -0700
            Re: unlock a phone Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-03-04 13:14 -0700
  Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-28 12:08 +1100
    Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 06:10 -0800
      Re: unloock a phone Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-28 17:37 +0100
      Re: unloock a phone Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2016-02-28 10:21 -0700
      Re: unloock a phone Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-29 11:24 +1100
        Re: unloock a phone "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-02-28 16:50 -0800
    Re: unloock a phone Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2016-02-29 19:52 +0000
  [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 23:30 +0800
    Re: [OT] Wolffan <AKWolffan@gmail.com> - 2016-02-28 17:53 -0500
      Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:17 +0800
    Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-28 19:59 -0800
      Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 19:19 +0800
        Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 14:44 -0800
          Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:53 +0800
            Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-01 14:16 -0800
              Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:46 +0800
                Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 18:24 -0800
                Re: [OT] The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-03-02 22:22 -0800
  [OT] Go misc.phone.mobile.iphone "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 18:58 +0800
  Re: unloock a phone, NO< its about them unlocking everyone's phones tesla sTinker <staff@truecarpentry.net> - 2016-03-13 11:27 -0700

csiph-web