Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #349047

Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely.

From DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely.
Date 2016-04-08 15:42 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ne91d9$4o8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <dmobv9F2n9lU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.7{5.59P.Seattle.2016}> <dmohnqF3v21U1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.7{9.32P.Seattle.2016}> <dmq6q4FgrpkU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/8/2016 1:07 PM, Homer wrote:
> On Friday 08/04/2016 5:32 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>
>>      If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely.
>
> I see no evidence for that. Mostly I see at least two generations of
> people who have only ever owned a mobile device (and possibly a games
> console), and their "PC" experience has been almost entirely limited to
> the classroom and workplace (and even there the "PC" is rapidly being
> replaced by tablets).
>
> Computer geeks have always been on the fringes of society. These days
> we're virtually extinct.
>
> Although you're right in the sense that, if you have a smartphone, you
> already have a "desktop", as they can be connected to keyboards, mice
> and large displays, essentially transforming them into "desktops".
>
> But again, as with simply buying a "PC", the fact is that a rapidly
> dwindling number of people have much interest in that use case. They
> want small, mobile and simple, and they just don't care about storage or
> computing power, for which most of the burden has been transferred into
> the Cloud.
>
> That's the new de facto paradigm, like it or not.


Only in your desperate mind, which hopes above all else to see Linux 
become the new "monopoly".  Unfortunately, it can't even be given away 
to end-users, which constitute the biggest personal computer market of 
all (a phone is NOT a PC).

In the real world, the race is still on to develop faster, more powerful 
desktop CPUs, GPUs, mobos, SSDs, memory, etc.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-04 14:14 -0400
  The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 12:27 -0700
    Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-04 16:18 -0400
  Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:18 -0700
    Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 00:48 -0700
      mental illness comes in many different flavors John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 03:21 -0700
        Re: mental illness comes in many different flavors DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-05 10:47 -0400
          Happily, mental illness comes in many different flavors.. DooFuS prefers Shit flavored, above all else. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 07:50 -0700
        Gohde wants to ban CLI in Linux is like the Muslims want to ban pork in Western schools Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 18:29 -0700
          Who let the dogs out? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-06 02:13 -0700
      Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-05 10:26 -0400
    Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-07 10:55 -0400
      Just because you can does NOT mean that you should, Ass Wipe John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 08:03 -0700
        Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-07 12:19 -0400
          Says, who? The DooFuS on COLA, says you. Enough said ... John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 10:24 -0700
          Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-08 10:17 +0000
            What does a Goober know about anything? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 03:29 -0700
              Re: What does a Goober know about anything? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-08 12:13 +0000
                Re: What does a Goober know about anything? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 05:28 -0700
                Re: What does a Goober know about anything? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-08 07:32 -0500
                Re: What does a Goober know about anything? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 05:53 -0700
                Re: What does a Goober know about anything? "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-08 23:33 +0000
                Re: What does a Goober know about anything? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-08 19:41 -0400
                Re: What does a Goober know about anything? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-11 07:28 -0500
            Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-08 10:56 -0400
              Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 11:15 -0400
      Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-07 12:01 -0400
  Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. X11 Sucks <xsucks@xxx.org/null> - 2016-04-04 21:52 +0100
  Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-04 23:11 +0000
    Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-04 19:19 -0400
  Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-05 08:48 +0200
    The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-05 05:53 -0400
      Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 07:09 -0400
        Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-05 14:15 +0200
          Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 09:35 -0400
            Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-05 16:09 +0200
              Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 10:23 -0400
          Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-05 09:50 -0400
            Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 10:22 -0400
      Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-05 13:05 +0100
        Re: The Troll Community is directly responsible for Trolling's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 09:34 -0400
  Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-05 10:57 +0200
    Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-05 07:06 -0400
  Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 01:23 +0100
    Re: Hordes of people would _love_ to have a desktop, but can't afford it. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 03:01 +0100
      I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 01:52 -0700
        Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 18:28 +0100
          Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-08 15:55 -0400
            Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 16:07 -0400
            Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-10 01:02 +0100
              Countless millions exposed to microshaft viruses as well 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-04-10 11:46 +0000
                Re: Countless millions exposed to microshaft viruses as well Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-10 09:45 -0400
          Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 13:52 -0700
          Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-11 08:09 -0500
            Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 18:45 +0000
              Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-11 12:08 -0700
              Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-11 14:58 -0500
                Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 00:56 +0000
                Re: I am game for fighting to the death the new generation of Zombies. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 09:55 -0700
      Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 18:07 +0100
        Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-08 15:42 -0400
          Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-10 00:55 +0100
            Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-10 08:10 -0400
              Re: If you've $700 phone, you have desktop too, most likely. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-10 09:36 -0400
        Re: Apple doesn't sell what I want, nor does Google; so I go DYI/custom. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-10 00:53 +0100
    Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-08 07:05 -0500
      Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-08 17:46 +0100
        Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 13:04 -0400
          Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-09 07:48 -0300
            Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-09 08:37 -0400
            Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-09 14:53 -0400
              Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-09 17:49 -0400
          Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-12 12:46 -0500
          Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-12 12:46 -0500
            Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:05 -0400
              Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-12 14:13 -0700
                Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. Silver Slimer <linux@sucks.balls> - 2016-04-12 17:27 -0400
            Re: The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-12 23:13 +0100
        The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's great success Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-08 13:48 -0400
          The Linux Community is directly responsible for Linux's abject failure Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-08 13:56 -0400

csiph-web